My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012682
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
1448
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544673
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0012682
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2020 4:31:42 AM
Creation date
7/18/2019 3:19:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012682
RECORD_ID
PR0544673
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006182
FACILITY_NAME
REGAL STATION #604
STREET_NUMBER
1448
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1448 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
550
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
regulate the amount of vapors extracted from the wells and/or shut <br /> down the blower if emissions exceed the predetermined warning <br /> concentrations. <br /> The analysis of the vapor stream during the pilot test show that a <br /> uncontrolled system would produce approximately a pound of benzene <br /> a day. Due to the high vapor pressure of benzene, benzene is one <br /> of the compounds that is most susceptible to vapor extraction and <br /> thus would diminish in its concentration in the vapor stream as <br /> extraction goes on. With this in mind all emission controlled by <br /> the above IR analyzer, which would control the amount of the vapor <br /> stream produced from the extraction wells, would keep the releases <br /> at or below the allowable emissions already allocated for this <br /> site. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The; .results of , ground. :water monitoring, November:: .21, 1990' <br /> indicate that; the ground water has droppedpproximataly eight <br /> feet: , since.,_early January,` 199.0,. and is flowing � redominately :t. <br /> the" southeast.,', Chemical r, s�aZts :of.,.the.water: samples'.taken:fr.om <br /> the. monitoL. .wells:show .cont�inatien to the :'gcound - ,water :with <br /> gasola.ne'ranges kaydrocarbo:�s, see-Table: 2, Figures 6:-and. 7: <br /> Soil contamination is limited to between the 25 foot and 40 foot <br /> depth of the eastern and western portions of the pump island area <br /> and southeast of the tank excavation, near soil boring SB2, sea <br /> Figure 8 and Table 1. This contamination is of gasoline range <br /> hydrocarbons. A vapor extraction source test . indicates .that <br /> approximately 59 pounds of gasoline range hydrocarbons can be <br /> pulled from the formation.per day via wells P1, P3 and EK at a <br /> flow rate of 30 cubic feet per minute. Also vacuum readings taken <br /> from the ground water monitoring wells during the pilot-source <br /> test showed vacuum influence across the entire lot with the <br /> exception of northwest corner near MW6, see figure 9A. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> ground water. sampling and <br /> monitoring for:this site. <br /> 2. Perform intermittent pumping from monitor wells' MWI and <br /> MWS to control .tha_apread of the hydrocarbon plume using Lawrence <br /> vacuum pump'and ri-moving approximately 5o gallons from both wells <br /> page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.