Laserfiche WebLink
rte+ERG <br /> Aegis Environmental , inc. <br /> February 14, 1991 <br /> Page 2 NOACAL <br /> Our scone of work also includes interpreting the GPR data and <br /> presenting our findings in a written report. <br /> ... GROUND PENETRATING RADAR <br /> ' Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is a method that provides a con- <br /> tinuous, high resolution cross-section depicting variations in <br /> r the electrical properties of the shallow subsurface. The method <br /> is particularly sensitive to variations in electrical conductivi- <br /> ty and electrical permittivity (the ability of a material to hold <br /> r a charge when an electrical field is applied) . <br /> ' In operation, the system continuously radiates an electro i <br /> magnetic <br /> Pulse into the ground from a transducer (antenna) as it is moved <br /> along a traverse. Since most earth materials are 'transparent to electromagnetic energy, only a portion of the radar signal is <br /> reflected back to the surface from interfaces representing varia- <br /> tions in electrical properties ", yen the signal encounters a <br /> metal object, however, ail of tt+r incident energy is reflected. <br /> The reflected signals are received by the same transducer and are <br /> transmitted to a graphical recorder. The resulting records can <br /> provide information regarding the stratification, the thickness <br /> and extent of fill material , thf: location of buried objects such <br /> as utilities, and changes in material conditions such as satura- <br /> tion and, in some instances, chemical differences <br /> ' (when the <br /> subsurface electrical properties are altered) . Generally,. rela- <br /> tive.ly high electrical conductivities reduce the penetration <br /> capability and limit radar performance. <br /> For this investigation, we used a Geophysical <br /> r Geo <br /> pylu Systems,Inc. SIR-3 Subsurface Interface Radar System equipped with a <br /> 500megaHertz <br /> (MHz) antenna. This antenna is near the center of the <br /> available frequency range and was used to provide high resolution <br /> at shallow depths. <br /> PROCEDURES <br /> We obtained GPR data by hand towing the 500 MHz antenna along the <br /> �. traverses shown on Plate 1 . Horizontal control along each tra- <br /> verse was established by electronically annotating the GPR re- <br /> cords at 5 foot intervals. These distances were determined from <br /> ir a fiberglass tape placed on the ground along the length of the <br /> traverse. <br /> Following each traverse, we examined the GPR records for ref lec- <br /> tion patterns indicative of buried objects. The locations of any <br /> ��--' <br /> anomalies we identified were then marked on the ground surface in <br /> the presence of Mr. Kimmerling. We subsequently performed a more <br /> thorough examination of the records in the office, and plotted <br /> the locations of suspected buried objects on a computer drawn <br /> plan view map.,, <br />