Laserfiche WebLink
' AUGEAS Corporation <br /> A <br /> California Natural Products <br /> Problem Assessment Report <br /> June,1991 <br /> 2.O CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the scope of work performed during this investigation, the following conclusions were <br /> developed: <br /> 1. An undetermined amount of gasoline has leaked from an underground product line leading from a <br /> 2,000-gallon twin-compartment above-ground fuel storage tank.The tank,fuel dispenser and product line <br /> were moved on July 26,1990.The tank and dispenser were intact;leakage occurred directly from the ends <br /> of the 18-inch long product line. The tank had not been in use since 1985. The tank was removed from <br /> the property for disposal on August 7, 1990. <br /> 2. The leakage of gasoline has spread laterally as well as vertically through the near-surface sandy soils <br /> contaminating over 10,000 cubic yards of soil.The concentration of gasoline remaining in the soil,locally <br /> exceeding 2,500 ppm, remains a potential threat to further groundwater contamination. <br /> a. 3.Although no free product was found on the surface of the water table,aromatic hydrocarbon compounds <br /> were found dissolved in the groundwater in two of the three monitoring wells. The levels of benzene <br /> present in the samples taken were above state action levels. <br /> Augeas Corporation recommends a two-phase final Remedial Plan designed to eliminate both the soil and <br /> groundwater contamination found at the site.Although the aspects of soil remediation will be discussed <br /> in more detail in the Final Remedial Plan (Appendix 1), the overall program will include the following <br /> tasks: <br /> Phase 1 <br /> Task 1 - Soil venting/vapor extraction to be applied to the soil between the buildings. <br /> The soil venting process is discussed further in Appendix 1, and represents the primary action proposed <br /> for site remediation.Soil beneath the concrete slab buildings will be considered encapsulated and will not <br /> be considered further.This contamination is expected to degrade through natural biologic activity in the <br /> soil, and should not pose a threat to groundwater quality. <br />