Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' 16 December 2002 <br /> i AGE-NC Project No 97-0300 <br />' Page 5 of 8 <br />' 5.0. ASSESSMENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL <br /> 1T1p3 <br /> Between August 1999 and June 200 ;ten so it borings(P-1 through P-7 and MW-1 through MW-3) <br />' were advanced at the site to investigate the extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil in the vicinity of the <br /> former USTs The greatest concentrations ofpetroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil were encountered <br /> in soil boring P-1 at a depth of 5 feet bsg and in soil boring P-3 at a depth of 10 feet bsg (Table 2), <br />' P-1 is located near the northwest corner of the former UST pit and P-3 is located along the southwest <br /> margin of the former UST pit (Figure 2) r <br />' General lithology is depicted in cross sectional view in Figures 11 and 12 Selected soil sample <br /> locations and the estimated extent of petroleum-impacted soil beneath the site are depicted in cross <br /> sectional view in Figures 13 and 14 The estimated distribution of adsorbed TPH concentrations are <br />' depicted in plan view in Figure 15, a generalized site conceptual model is depicted in Figure 16 <br /> When the data collected at the site is plotted in both plan view and cross sectional view,the apparent <br />' volume of petroleum impacted soil remaining beneath the site is approximately 770 cubic yards <br /> (Appendix D) <br />' A mass-volume calculation using the data collected during investigation of the former UST area, <br /> yields approximately 6 69 gallons of gasoline and 6 08 gallons of diesel in the remaining impacted <br /> soil at the site(Appendix D)`A short diameter of 36 feet, a long diameter of 63 feet and a height of <br />' 35 feet were used to estimate a coned elliptical volume of impacted soil (Figures 13, 14 and 15) An <br /> average concentration of 21 50 mg/kg was used to calculate the total volume of remaining gasoline <br /> and 2190 mg/kg to calculate the total volume of remaining diesel in impacted-soil <br /> 6.0. ASSESSMENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED GROUND WATER <br /> Three ground water rgonitonng wells(MW-1,MW-2 and MW-3)were installed at the site between <br /> 05 and 06 June 2002' and four ground water monitormg/sampling events have been performed <br />' between 16 June 2000 and 22 March 2001 to investigate the extent of hydrocarbon-imp acted ground <br /> water in the vicinity of the former USTs Durin &;8me,depths to groundwater from wells MW-1, <br /> MW-2 and MW-3 were measured between 4i 38 and 52 15 feet below the top of well casings <br />' Generally, ground water elevation at the site decreased approximately 9 feet between the June and <br /> September 2000 monitoring events,but increased approximately 8 feet between the September 2000 <br /> and March 2001 ground water monitoring events Ground water monitoring data in the area of <br /> MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 indicated a ground water flow direction generally toward the south- <br /> southeast at gradients between 0 01 ft/ft and 0 003 ft/ft (Figures 6, 7, 8 and 9) Due to the low <br /> gradient at the site,slight variations in ground water measurements or changes ofrecharge/discharge <br /> of the local ground water could greatly modify the inferred ground water flow direction Ground <br /> . water elevation data are summarized on Table 3 <br /> Advanced GeoE nvi ron mental,Inc r <br /> I <br />