Laserfiche WebLink
REG 603 UPDATE-8 7/17/92 <br /> 4 0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> As stated in earlier reports, the soil is contaminated with <br /> gasoline range hydrocarbons beneath the tank field (MW10) and <br /> along the capillary fringe of the ground water, MW1, MW2, MW3 and <br /> MW10. Ground water beneath the site contains the dissolved <br /> constituents of gasoline range hydrocarbons and has spread out <br /> from beneath the site to the north MW-6, to the south MW-7 to the <br /> west MW-9 and to the east MW-8. The latest ground water <br /> samplings, March 10 and June 18, 1992, have shown a decline in- the <br /> lateral extent of the plume, see Figures 5A (12-17-91) and 5B (6- <br /> 18-92) <br /> Vapor extraction commenced on October 17, 1991 and up until March <br /> 18, 1992 has operated for 2611 hours out of a possible 3674 for a <br /> 71% run time, destroying 16,156 pounds of gasoline range <br /> hydrocarbons. Since the last status report, February 3, 1992, a <br /> total of 4884 pounds of gasoline range hydrocarbons have been <br /> removed/destroyed DCE, TCE and PCE screening indicates that <br /> these compounds are not present in the vapor stream at this site. <br /> . Ground water elevation measurements show the ground water is being <br /> mounded at the lower K value wells MW3 and MW10, while the overall <br /> flow direction is to the northeast and southeast. <br /> Ground water sample results obtained on December 17, 1991, <br /> approximately 1473 hours after commencement of vapor extraction <br /> compared to the ground water sample results obtained on June 18, <br /> 1992, 5885 hours after commencement of vapor extraction, show a <br /> decline in the extent of the dissolved constituents in all of the <br /> monitoring wells with the exception of MW1 and MW3 which have <br /> floating product and MW10 which was dry, see Table 1 and Figures <br /> 5A and 5B. <br /> It is felt that once the air dilute has been completely closed and <br /> all vacuum recovery can be directed to MW1, MW2, MW3, MW10 and EX- <br /> 4", an increase in the vacuum influence will be obtained and a <br /> more substantial reduction in the contaminants, found in the other <br /> wells, will be noted <br /> The permit to dump treated ground water to the sewer has been <br /> applied for and once approved, ground water pumping will occur <br /> from monitor wells MW1 and MW3. Treatment will be tank stripping, <br /> utilizing the "ConVault" as a 1000 gallon tank stripper to batch <br /> treat approximately 300 gallons every 5 hours. All vapors driven <br /> off of by the air stripping from the tank will be processed into <br /> the thermal oxidizing unit for destruction, see Appendix D - <br /> WaterDischarge Permit Application. <br /> • <br /> PAGE 11 <br />