Laserfiche WebLink
REG 603 UPDATE--6 2/21/92 <br /> • <br /> the 55 gallon drum storing the water "purged" prior to sampling <br /> the wells. Product thickness measurements obtained on subsequent <br /> site visits have shown only a sheen of product in MW1 until <br /> September, 1991 when 0. 02 feet of yellow-amber product was <br /> discovered, and also wells MW3 and MW10 have product sheens <br /> (showing up after the vapor extraction source test on MW10 ) . <br /> 3 . 2 SITE CONDITIONS <br /> A.a. GROUND WATER: September 18 , 1991 <br /> The September, 1991 chemical results ( sampled 9/18/91) indicate <br /> that dissolved benzene in monitor wells MW-2, MW-4, MW-6, MW-8, <br /> and MW-9 substantially exceeds the action level for drinking water <br /> of 1.0 ppb, set by the DHS, see Table 1. Monitor well MW--7 <br /> contains a lower benzene value of 4 . 9 ppb and monitor well MW5 is <br /> below the detection limit ( <0 . 3 ) for benzene. Monitor wells MW1, <br /> MW3 and MW10 contained a sheen of floating product ( <0. 011 ) . <br /> Strong to moderate bio-odors were also noted along with a grey <br /> green coloration of the purged ground water from monitor wells <br />. MW2, MW7 and MW8 . <br /> A. b. GROUND WATER: December 17, 1991 <br /> The December, 1991 chemical results (sampled 12/17/91) indicate <br /> that dissolved benzene in monitor wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-8, <br /> and MW-10 substantially exceeds the action level for drinking <br /> water of 1.0 ppb, set by the DHS, see Table 1. Monitor wells MW-6 <br /> and MW-9 have moderate levels of benzene ( 110 and 120 ppb <br /> respectively) and Monitor well MW-7 contains a lower benzene value <br /> of 4. 9 ppb. Monitor well MW5 is below the detection limit ( <0. 3 ) <br /> for benzene. Since the start up of vacuum extraction from MW1 and <br /> MW10 the benzene levels in the monitor wells have dropped in all <br /> of the wells with the exception of MW8. Monitoring wells MW2 and <br /> MW3 were added to the vapor extraction system on January 14, 1992. <br /> These wells should influence the down gradient off site extent of <br /> the plume (MWS ) .Monitor wells MW1, MW3 and MW10 contained a sheen <br /> of floating product (<0 . 011 ) . Strong to moderate bio-odors were <br /> 1 c., nn+cr7 1 nnrr .7-1 *h a rrreT rTrocn e-rNI^.rat�^n rif the rtivrrrcri rrrnijnA <br /> vLA haV iiV 4441 4.a1 via 4J �..... �y � yi .ria Y 7rr y� <br /> water from monitor wells MW2, MW3 and MW8 . <br /> FECAL COLIFORM <br /> Monitor wells MW2, MW3, MW4, MWS, 1W7 and MW8 were sampled on <br /> December 17-18, 1991 and January 21, 1992, for analysis of fecal <br /> coliform. These samples were placed into 500 ml plastic <br /> t containers and hand delivered that day to F.G.L. Environmental <br /> Laboratories for Fecal Coliform Analysis. The December, 1991 <br /> sampling showed MW-2 tested at 16 MPN/100 ml, while MW-3 and MW-8 <br /> PAGE 6 <br />