Laserfiche WebLink
contained 20 ug/L MTBE MWl l is cross gradient of R603 and has always been below laboratory <br /> . detection lunits for TPHg,BTEX. <br /> Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) analysis was performed during the initial sampling of the groundwater <br /> monitoring wells, May 1989 and on sod samples during the UST removal EDS has always tested <br /> below laboratory lower detection limits. In March 1994, the possibility of 1,2 dichloroethylene <br /> being present was examined in MW 1, MW6, MW9 and MW 11, all with results below the lower <br /> detection limits. All analytes tested (including DCA and DCE) using EPA methods SW 845 and <br /> methods 5030/8010 were below laboratory lower detection <br /> 5. The quarterly groundwater monitoring has not been conducted since January <br /> 3999. <br /> At the request of Wickland Properties and to comply with Sari Joaquin County Health oversite, <br /> Western Geo-Engineers sample raof'�site w ells show TPHg atwells on 7 r 1 000 uglL MW-8, benzene2000. The mND, <br /> um <br /> groundwater monitoring results <br /> toluene at 43 ug/L MW-8, ethylbenzene at 260 ug/L MW-8, es at ,400 g/Lfor M anal <br /> -8 and <br /> MTBE at 38 ug/L MW-11. MW12 was belowlaboratory lower detection <br /> limytes <br /> tested except TPHg at 81 ug/L. MW-8 was below laboratory lower detection limits for benzene, <br /> and MTBE aril MW-11 contained only MTBE Off-site wells MW5, MW6, <br /> MW7 and MW9 are <br /> all below laboratory lower detection limits <br /> fromall analytes free phase tested product to belawter labQrator�y ower <br /> tion <br /> levels beneath the site have been MW3 and <br /> detection limits for TPHg, Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, and Xylenes for MW1, <br /> MW4. MW2, located in low conductivity portioXof ta aquifer, ins�840 tains ug/L <br /> �g/1-,TPHg <br /> Toluene, 12 ug/L Ethyl Benzene and 120 ug/L Y <br /> ug/L Ethyl Benzene and 40 ug/L Xylenes <br /> Other CRWQCB-CVR concerns voiced in the July 18, 2000 <br /> Nonconcurrance letter. <br /> TABLE 1 w CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA FOR NO FURTHER ACTION <br /> REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES. <br /> This checklist contains 15 items of which concerns were voice for items 4 , 8 , 9 , and 13 The <br /> following portion of this report address these items. <br /> Item 4. No- Excavated soils associated with the UST's were retumed to the tank <br /> Pit <br /> A letter from Applied GeoSysteins to Jackson Road Landfill, Sacramento County documents that <br /> an estimated 550 cubic yards of soexcavated Conractors on November 2 aridtransported,�98g d disposed <br /> at <br /> ej Jackson Road Landfill by Town& Country <br /> 4 R-603 Jan 2001 <br />