Laserfiche WebLink
February 2, 2001 <br /> Wright Environmental Services, Inc <br /> Page 2 <br /> FIELD SURVEY <br /> We scanned the investigation areas with the EMLL instrumentation for the presence of buried <br /> utilities or other metallic objects This reconnaissance scanning consisted of covering the <br /> accessible portions of the survey area with bidirectional traverses spaced approximately four feet <br /> apart The presence of reinforced concrete east of the welding building precluded the use of the <br /> EMLL metal detector in that area During the survey, Wright Environmental Services observed <br /> that an exposed pipe at the northwest comer of the welding building (see Plate 1) was of a <br /> different construction, having a slightly larger diameter, than the other cut-off pipes along the <br /> edge of the concrete apron We used the EMLL instrumentation to specifically explore for <br /> subsurface extensions of that pine, or potentially related UST's <br /> Following the EMLL, we obtained GPR data along primary traverses oriented east/west in the <br /> southern portion of the survey area as well as in the vicinity of tl ie southernmost trailer GPR <br /> traverses were oriented north/south to the west and north of the welding building These GPR <br /> traverses were spaced approximately 4 feet apart to allow for detection of relatively small UST's <br /> The resultant GPR records were analyzed for reflection pattems characteristic of UST's and other <br /> features that could represent potential contaminant sources Additional traverses were performed <br /> • perpendicular to the primary traverses over suspect areas that required further definition As with <br /> the EMLL method, the reinforced concrete east of the welding buiiaing limited the effectiveness <br /> of GPR in that area The locations of detected subsurface features were painted on the ground <br /> surface <br /> RESULTS <br /> The interpreted results of the geophysical investigation are presented on the geophysical survey <br /> map, Plate 1 This man also shows the locations of the GPR traverses ants above ground cultural <br /> features No UST-like ouned objects were detected within the limits of the geoohysical <br /> investigation area The significant objects that were detected are comprised of the following <br /> subsurface features one anomalous GPR area, one small EMLL anomaly representing isolated <br /> bune'd metal, and a section of a suspected vent line In the course of the UST search, we <br /> detected several additional utilities including a suspected water line, and four undifferentiated <br /> utilities (utilities of an undetermined tyoe or nature) Our interpretations regarding these items are <br /> discussed further below <br /> Subsurface Features <br /> The GFR anomaly, as referred to on Plate 1, was detected east of the muffler building We <br /> observed this feature on the GPR records as an area of aiscontinuous subsurface reflection <br /> patterns that may be indicative of burred debris It is located in the vicinity of the reported UST <br /> removals and may represent a backfilled area The metal detector did not produce a response <br /> • over this area, indicating that the GPR anomaly does not represent a metallic object such as a <br /> UST or drum GPR data from traverses across the EMLL anomaly, located north of the former <br /> welding building (and shown in blue with diagonal shading on Plate 1), indicate that it is probably <br /> due to small near surface metallic debris <br />