Laserfiche WebLink
MR_ a ...s. _ _ <br /> tou <br /> WESTERN +GEO-ENGINEERS <br /> SECTION 8.0 <br /> DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY <br /> Desert Petroleum has owned and operated the project site as a gasstation fility <br /> sor to Desert <br /> ince 1979, this site has been an active service station <br /> ownership. On April 19, 1988 the station was undergoing remodeling fortDesert <br /> ac <br /> Petroleum, Inc. The existing tanks, piping, islands, <br /> and overall staticxn was to be <br /> upgraded and remodeled by Walton Engineering of West Sacramento, CA. Upon <br /> tank removal hydrocarbon odors ware noticed and,the construction <br /> aon was <br /> discontinued, except for remov,r�i of known o�'taminated soil from the tank <br /> excavation area; a^tiI assessment of the possible <br /> contamination to soil and water <br /> Could be performed(see figure 4A and Appendix J). Tank removal was performed <br /> on this date in which four underg',ound storage tanks were removed(one regular <br /> gasoline, one unleaded gasoline, one super unleaded gasoline and one waste oil). <br /> 6hortly after tank removal, Western Geo-Engineers along with Walton Engineering <br /> Proceeded with the initial phase of the investigation by installing three 2 inch ground <br /> water monitoring wells (MW 1 through MW 3) on May 5 and 8, 1888 on site (see <br /> figures 4A and Appendices A, H, K and L). These wells were installed to a total <br /> depth of 29 feet. Monitor well 1 was installed north and closest to the tank <br /> excavation and sampling showed ground water contamination with hydrocarbons. <br /> Monitor well 2 was installed southeast of the excavation behind the station builiding <br /> and Monitor well 3 was installed east of the excavation and pre-existing pump <br /> islands. Sampling of monitor wells 2 and 3 indicateno ground water contamination <br /> exists in this area Soil samples taken from the base and sidewalls of the fuel tank <br /> excavation and from boring 1 WW 1) indicate that all soil contamination associated <br /> excavation had to be re- excavated, a soil sample taken at the base of the original <br /> with the fuel tanks was removed during initial tank removal. The waste oil tank <br /> excavation indicated that soll contaminated with oil type hydrocarbons still existed. <br /> The re-excavation of the waste oil site was performed June ti, 1988 under the <br /> supervision of Western Geo-Engineers and San Joaquin Local Health inspectors <br /> The excavation at this time was expanded in anorth-south and east- Westdirection' <br /> and deepened approximately 1112 to 2 feet. The four soil samples taken at the base <br /> of each wall of me excavation indicate that all contaminated soil has been removed. <br /> Total hydrocarbon concentrations that were present in the soil at the fuel tank <br /> excavation ranged from non-detected in the native soil left after excavation to 33 <br /> parts per miilon, gasoline range, in the spoil soil pile. Total hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations that were present in the :waste oil excavation ranged from <br /> nor:-detected in the re-excavation to 32 parts per million, motor oil range, in the <br /> original excavation. Hydorcarbon concentrations in the ground water ex <br /> ----------------fue_!_tank_excavation-ran a from 20.5 arts _po ..- .11—the -----------__- -� <br /> -- g p per_-million-ire-tfie north end and 77.7 parts <br /> per million in the south end, gasoline range. Hydocarbon concentrations in the soil <br /> taken from.the borings (MW 1, 2 and 3) are non-detected. Hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations in the groundwater sampled from the monitor wells range from <br /> non-detected in MW 2 & 3 and non-detected to 4.0 arts <br /> iri MW I. No floating P per million,-gasoline range, <br /> :J g product was observed in the excavations or the monitor wells <br /> during Western Geo-Engineers investigation (other than the thin fluorescent skim <br /> from boring of MW#1). <br /> page 36 <br />