My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010981
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505733
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:07 AM
Creation date
9/3/2019 2:46:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010981
RECORD_ID
PR0505733
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006970
FACILITY_NAME
TOSCO #787
STREET_NUMBER
950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
23406002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
950 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
------------- <br /> TMS TABLE #3 <br /> 'Ole � Section II Closures <br /> In addition, the following information and appropriate data for Appendix A <br /> shall be submitted when evaluating Case 2 Closures. All conditions listed in <br /> Case 02 (page 9) must be met. <br /> SITE HISTORY <br /> 01 Describe thesib acme, condition, use and tvo�e of ank removed, and <br /> submit a map showing the former ta�ystem and existing buildings on <br /> site. <br /> 0 Submit an evaluation of the inventory records reviewed for the three <br /> months prior to removal in order to estimate the quantity of product <br /> �Jt�'cF r released. <br /> l7* f, 3 Submit a summary of past site information, such as precision test <br /> results, tank repairs or construction activities. <br /> $ What types of businesses operated at this site previously? <br /> a(F,1 What was the product volume pumped per month for each tank? <br /> 6. Submit a survey of nearby wells. <br /> 7. List other sources of site specific information checked (e.g. Utility <br /> Company, Public Works Department, US and State Geologic Surveys, State <br /> and County Health Department, County and Regional Planning, local fire <br /> departments, etc.). <br /> SITE CHARACTERISTICS <br /> 1. Describe evidence of rresent (e.g. stained soil, free product, <br /> odors, etc.). <br /> 2. Describe visible preferential pathways (sand lens, root holes, etc.) in <br /> the excavation pits. <br /> 3. Submit site map of surface waterbodies (ponds, creeks, stream, etc.) or <br /> possible subsurface conduits (sewers, septic tanks, utility lines, etc.) <br /> in the vicinit_; of the site. <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> (if the answer to any of the following is NO, full explanations are required) <br /> 1. Were additional samples (other than the minimum required) taken where <br /> obviously contaminated soil was present? <br /> 2. Did sampling and analytical protocols conform to standards described in <br /> LOFT and this document? <br /> 3. Were the appropriate laboratory analyses used (see Table 2)? <br /> 4. Were the laboratory analysis and QA/QC results submitted? <br /> 5. In cases of high water table, a) were samples taken from the sidewalls <br /> and b) was water present in the excavation pit? <br /> 6. Were soil samples taken for every 20 lineal feet of underground piping? <br /> 7. Were depth and location of soil samples submitted? <br /> -21- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.