Laserfiche WebLink
C <br /> 4.) Septic System Contributions: Data from various sources including independent <br /> investigators, the U.S. EPA, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board estimate nitrogen <br /> I from domestic sewage to be 12 grams N per person per day (g N/capita/day) to a high of <br /> 90 g N/capita/day. Hantzche and Finnemore (1992) correlated septic tank effluent concentrations <br /> multiplied by water discharge to the septic tank. They formulated a water discharge of 100 <br /> gal/capita/day with an effluent concentration of 30-60 mg NIL. It is our opinion that 60 mg NIL is <br /> most accurate for this type of operation. The following calculations determine nitrate-nitrogen <br /> loading from septic system contributions: <br /> 12 people max. on-site x 100 gals/day= 1200 gals x 3.79 L/gal =4548 L/d x 60 mg NIL = <br /> 273 grms N/day x 365 days/yr= 100 kg N/yr x 2.2 lb/kg =220 lbs N/yr. This impact is negligible <br /> in comparison to the amount of nitrogen produced by the dairy facility and used by the associated <br /> cropland. <br /> C. DAIRY NITROGEN PRODUCTION CALCULATIONS <br /> As referenced, the Rocha Dairy sells all of the manure solids produced by the dairy population for <br /> off-site use. The Nutrient and Irrigation Water Management Plan(NIWMP) calculations found in <br /> Appendix"F" demonstrate the facility may apply liquid manure (nutrient water) on all the above- <br /> referenced cropland acreage without overload. The NIWMP document was formulated by the <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board in Sacramento. In addition to the current <br /> Rocha Dairy cow population, a second NIWMP was prepared to illustrate a reasonable maximum <br /> dairy cow population, again, based on ther��emse that all solids are exported. <br /> A reasonable maximum number of milk cows was formulated without attempting to exactly <br /> equate liquid nitrogen produced by the dairy herd with crop nitrogen requirements, because total <br /> nitrogen excreted from dairy animals is difficult to quantify. The rates of several important <br /> nitrogen transformation processes can only be estimated. Therefore, a safety factor was <br /> incorporated. Secondly, the fact that the animals will be confined under two different housing <br /> structures (flushed corral vs. freestall) during different times of the year creates differences in <br /> nitrogen loading. The calculations incorporate the use of animal units (AU) for the Holstein dairy <br /> cow to formulate nitrogen loading. <br /> In addition to the current lease arrangement between Mr. Rocha and Mr. Moreda, Mr. Moreda <br /> also has his own dairy and heifer ranch in Petaluma, California. For six months out of each year, <br /> he raises all his heifers on pasture land and then transports them to the Rocha Dairy facility. <br /> Consequently, the heifer animal units listed in the N1WMP could be adjusted downward; <br /> however, they were not. <br /> I' <br /> The following Table illustrates the current milk cow population in comparison with the theoretical <br /> maximum number of milk cow the facility can support: <br /> 11 <br /> Chesney ConsuCting <br />