My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0003465 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ARBOR
>
6551
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0300525
>
SU0003465 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:55 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 9:54:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0003465
PE
2690
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0300525
STREET_NUMBER
6551
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ARBOR
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
4/30/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
6551 W ARBOR AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
10/30/2003 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\ARBOR\6551\PA-0300525\SU0003465\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C <br /> 4.) Septic System Contributions: Data from various sources including independent <br /> investigators, the U.S. EPA, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board estimate nitrogen <br /> I from domestic sewage to be 12 grams N per person per day (g N/capita/day) to a high of <br /> 90 g N/capita/day. Hantzche and Finnemore (1992) correlated septic tank effluent concentrations <br /> multiplied by water discharge to the septic tank. They formulated a water discharge of 100 <br /> gal/capita/day with an effluent concentration of 30-60 mg NIL. It is our opinion that 60 mg NIL is <br /> most accurate for this type of operation. The following calculations determine nitrate-nitrogen <br /> loading from septic system contributions: <br /> 12 people max. on-site x 100 gals/day= 1200 gals x 3.79 L/gal =4548 L/d x 60 mg NIL = <br /> 273 grms N/day x 365 days/yr= 100 kg N/yr x 2.2 lb/kg =220 lbs N/yr. This impact is negligible <br /> in comparison to the amount of nitrogen produced by the dairy facility and used by the associated <br /> cropland. <br /> C. DAIRY NITROGEN PRODUCTION CALCULATIONS <br /> As referenced, the Rocha Dairy sells all of the manure solids produced by the dairy population for <br /> off-site use. The Nutrient and Irrigation Water Management Plan(NIWMP) calculations found in <br /> Appendix"F" demonstrate the facility may apply liquid manure (nutrient water) on all the above- <br /> referenced cropland acreage without overload. The NIWMP document was formulated by the <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board in Sacramento. In addition to the current <br /> Rocha Dairy cow population, a second NIWMP was prepared to illustrate a reasonable maximum <br /> dairy cow population, again, based on ther��emse that all solids are exported. <br /> A reasonable maximum number of milk cows was formulated without attempting to exactly <br /> equate liquid nitrogen produced by the dairy herd with crop nitrogen requirements, because total <br /> nitrogen excreted from dairy animals is difficult to quantify. The rates of several important <br /> nitrogen transformation processes can only be estimated. Therefore, a safety factor was <br /> incorporated. Secondly, the fact that the animals will be confined under two different housing <br /> structures (flushed corral vs. freestall) during different times of the year creates differences in <br /> nitrogen loading. The calculations incorporate the use of animal units (AU) for the Holstein dairy <br /> cow to formulate nitrogen loading. <br /> In addition to the current lease arrangement between Mr. Rocha and Mr. Moreda, Mr. Moreda <br /> also has his own dairy and heifer ranch in Petaluma, California. For six months out of each year, <br /> he raises all his heifers on pasture land and then transports them to the Rocha Dairy facility. <br /> Consequently, the heifer animal units listed in the N1WMP could be adjusted downward; <br /> however, they were not. <br /> I' <br /> The following Table illustrates the current milk cow population in comparison with the theoretical <br /> maximum number of milk cow the facility can support: <br /> 11 <br /> Chesney ConsuCting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.