My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0800105
>
SU0007861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 11:37:03 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:03:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007861
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0800105
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
APN
20106003
ENTERED_DATE
8/11/2009 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/24/2009 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\EIR PA-0800105\NOP.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
687
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.A-15 -f <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> The 2013 expansion project included approximately 184 acres of agricultural land located south <br /> and west of the current permitted landfill areas. This area is not part of the currently proposed <br /> Project. The 126-acre CYA parcel in the northeast portion of the existing Forward Landfill <br /> contains approximately 59.4 acres of agricultural land. The agricultural land in the CYA parcel ` <br /> would not be affected by the proposed 2014 Expansion Project. <br /> Williamson Act <br /> The 2013 EIR discussed Land Conservation (Williamson) Act contracts, and procedures for non- <br /> renewal and cancellation for Williamson Act contracts. The 2014 Expansion Project is not on <br /> land subject to a Williamson Act contract. <br /> Multi-Species Conservation and Open Space Plan <br /> San Joaquin County adopted the San Joaquin Multi-Species Conservation and Open Space Plan <br /> (SJMSCP) in February 2001. The SJMSCP serves as comprehensive mitigation for impacts to <br /> threatened, endangered, rare, and other unlisted SJMSCP Covered Species. Participation in the <br /> SJMSCP is voluntary. Forward, Inc. is currently participating in the SJMSCP for the existing — <br /> landfill. <br /> Impacts and Mitigation Measures _ <br /> Standards of Significance <br /> The proposed project would have a significant impact with regard to land use, planning, and <br /> agricultural land if it would: <br /> • Physically divide an established community, - <br /> • Conflict with applicable land use plans, policies, or regulation of an agency with <br /> jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the General Plan, specific <br /> plans, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding <br /> or mitigating an environmental effect, <br /> • Conflict with an applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community <br /> conservation plan, or <br /> • Convert farmland to non-agricultural use. <br /> This section updates the impacts and mitigations considered in the 2013 EIR, to account for <br /> changes in the proposed project. To facilitate review of the section and comparison of analyses <br /> between the 2013 EIR and this document, the heading for each impact or mitigation measure <br /> reflects whether that impact is the same, revised, or replaced. For example, the heading for <br /> Impact A.1 is "Impact A.1: Compliance with County Plans and Policies. (Revises 2013 EIR <br /> Impact A.1)";the heading for Impact A.5 is "Impact A.5 Night lighting at the proposed project <br /> could interfere with airport landing lights. (Same As 2013 EIR Impact A.5)". <br /> Impact A.1: Compliance with County Plans and Policies. (Revises 2013 EIR Impact AM <br /> Project-related policy conflicts and inconsistencies do not, in and of themselves, constitute a <br /> significant environmental impact and are considered to be environmental impacts only when <br /> they would result in direct physical effects, which this EIR identifies pursuant to CEQA. All <br /> 2 Source: California Code of Regulations,Title 14,Division 6, Chapter 3,Sections 15000-15387 and �- <br /> Appendices A-K, "Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act", <br /> Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.