Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.B-16 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> Notes: <br /> Level of Service based on worst approach delay for two-way stop controlled intersections and average delay <br /> for all-way stop-controlled and Signalized intersections. <br /> Minor Stop=Stop sign-controlled. Only the minor street stops. <br /> App=Approach,Avg=Average <br /> Newcastle Road as Possible Access to Landfill <br /> L <br /> As discussed under Impact B.8,below, the proposed project driveway currently operates at an <br /> acceptable level of service, and would continue to operate at an acceptable level of service <br /> 6. under near-term and 2035 cumulative conditions. In response to comments on the 2013 Draft <br /> EIR for the previously proposed project, landfill access via Newcastle Road was analyzed as an <br /> alternative to the existing entrance on Austin Road, and is summarized below.' <br /> L Newcastle Road is a two-lane rural road with a north-south alignment. It extends south from <br /> Arch Road for about 1.5 miles, where the paved road ends. An unpaved extension continues <br /> south approximately another 1/4 mile where it terminates just north of Littlejohns Creek. The <br /> j` condition of the paved segment of Newcastle Road is weathered and cracked in some locations. <br /> The pavement is adequate for the low traffic volumes and very low truck volumes it currently <br /> - carries. Several residences front the western side of Newcastle Road, and the Northern <br /> California Youth Correctional Center is located east of Newcastle Road. <br /> Use of Newcastle Road for landfill access would substantially increase truck traffic on that road, <br /> which would shorten the pavement life considerably, and would require installation of a second <br /> 60 entry station with truck scales. In addition,Newcastle Road currently terminates north of <br /> Littlejohns Creek. Truck access to the Forward Landfill would require construction of a creek <br /> crossing, which could have adverse environmental impacts to the streambed. For these reasons, <br /> and because the existing project driveway operates, and would continue to operate, at a <br /> satisfactory level of service,use of Newcastle Road for access to the landfill does not appear to <br /> provide a better alternative. Because this alternative access is not proposed,no impact would <br /> k occur. <br /> L <br /> Impact B.2. Potential Project Impact on Travel Speed on Austin Road. (Revises 2013 EIR <br /> Impact B.2). <br /> Operations of the road segment along Austin Road between the project driveway and Arch <br /> Road were evaluated in the 2012 Republic ITS report, in accordance with the guidelines of <br /> ` Chapter 20 of the Highway Capacity Manual (TRB, 2000). Since the proposed project would add <br /> truck traffic to the study segment, the percent of trucks was increased for the "With Project" <br /> scenarios compared to the "No Project" scenarios. Table IV.B-6 shows the results of the <br /> evaluation for the near term scenarios. All speeds would be in the acceptable range of LOS A. <br /> Southbound values are all LOS A because southbound traffic is uncontrolled at the project <br /> driveway. <br /> After the vehicle speed analysis was conducted by Republic ITS in 2012, traffic signals were <br /> installed at the California Heath Care Facility entrance on Austin Road. When this traffic light <br /> is red for vehicle approaches on Austin Road, it may result in a small decrease in vehicle speed <br /> along the study segment of Austin Road. However, since the projected LOS levels are A, the <br /> traffic signal is not expected to worsen the travel speed LOS to unacceptable conditions. <br /> 'Steve Fitzsimons, Republic ITS,Memo To: Sangeeta LewislLewis Engineering,Re:Forward Inc, <br /> Supplemental Analysis of Newcastle Road Access, February 19,2010. <br />