Laserfiche WebLink
r.' Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.E-15 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> low <br /> The Post-Project or Future Potential scenario was estimated in the HRA assuming full <br /> implementation of the Project described in the HRA,namely the proposed development of <br /> additional disposal area within the currently permitted Forward Landfill boundary and creek <br /> re-location. The proposed expansion does include an increase in the rate of landfill-related <br /> activities from the current actual rate to the full permitted waste acceptance rate of 8,668 tons <br /> ►� per day. The project would result in an increase of air toxics emissions from onsite emission <br /> sources associated with the operation of the project such as flare and/or LFG engines, DPM <br /> emissions from increased truck trips, and fugitive LFG emissions. <br /> The incremental carcinogenic risk(increase in cancer risk from the Current Actual to the Project <br /> scenario Landfill Gas Flare)is estimated to be 4 cancer occurrences per million persons at the <br /> nearest occupied receptor. This value is below the threshold of 10 cancers per million and thus, <br /> *- the impact is less than significant. <br /> This analysis is based on conservative (overestimated)assumptions, and can be considered a <br /> L, worst-case analysis. The maximum incremental cancer risk is relatively small compared with <br /> the overall lifetime cancer incidence of 200,000 to 250,000 per million in the United States. <br /> The OEHHA has established a significance threshold for non-cancer health risk based on <br /> concentrations that would result in a Hazard Index (HI) greater than 1.0. Based on the <br /> modeling, the non-cancer health risks would be well below the Hazard Index of 1.0 at all <br /> receptors. The maximum non-cancer acute hazard risk would be an HI of 0.0117. The <br /> maximum non-cancer chronic hazard risk would be an HI of 0.00016. These values are below <br /> the threshold of 1.0 and thus, the impact is less than significant. <br /> y, Implementation of the measures identified in Mitigation Measure D.2a would reduce emissions <br /> and further reduce both cancer and non-cancer health risks near the project area. <br /> 4 <br /> ti <br /> s <br />