Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.F-1 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> F. VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE <br /> This section addresses the impacts of the 2014 Expansion Project to existing or potentially <br /> occurring biological resources. It uses a "worst-case"baseline, comparing project impacts to <br /> existing on-the-ground conditions. As outlined in the Project Description(Section III), the <br /> proposed additional development area includes two areas within the currently permitted landfill <br /> boundary as shown on Figure IH.0-2;approximately 8.7 acres in the northeast corner of the site <br /> and approximately 30.0 acres in the south area(of which approximately 6.2 acres would be newly <br /> permitted landfill footprint and about 23.8 acres are currently permitted for landfill footprint,8.4 <br /> acres of which currently house the landfill's composting facility). Implementation of this project <br /> also would require the realignment of a 3,000-foot section of the South Branch of the South Fork <br /> of Littlejohn's Creek. The impacts and mitigations in this section replace those in Section IV.H of <br /> the 2013 EIR. <br /> Setting — <br /> Methodology <br /> Identification of the potentially occurring special-status biological resources for the proposed — <br /> project was based in part on the previous analysis and a biological assessment prepared for the <br /> present study area (WRA 2005a). <br /> The information presented herein is intended to update that provided in the WRA biological <br /> assessment and to bring current the analysis of impacts, reflecting recent changes in status of <br /> endangered, threatened, and rare species,as well as State and federal legislation regarding — <br /> biological resources. Updated information on special-status plant and animal species was <br /> compiled through review of databases maintained by the California Natural Diversity Data <br /> Base (CNDDB 2012, CNDDB 2014), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS 2012,2014), the <br /> California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG 2012 a,b;2011 a,b), the California Native Plant -' <br /> Society (CNPS 2012, 2014), and the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and <br /> Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) (SJCOG 2000). <br /> Other technical studies prepared in support of this EIR and reviewed as part of this analysis — <br /> include preconstruction surveys for burrowing owl, western gulls and other birds (WRA 2002a, <br /> 2004,2005b, 2007 and 2009), a Pacific(western) pond turtle survey (WRA 2002b), a fisheries <br /> survey and fisheries habitat assessment of the North Branch of the South Fork of Littlejohn's — <br /> Creek(A.A. Rich Associates 2002), and a wetland delineation the South Branch of the South <br /> Fork of Littlejohn's Creek (Monk&Associates 2007). Additional reports reviewed include the <br /> conceptual design report of the proposed realignment of 3000 feet of the South Branch of the — <br /> South Fork of Littlejohn's Creek(Questa Engineering Corporation 2007) to a new 3200-foot <br /> channel. Also reviewed for this analysis are a pilot bird-control program conducted in March <br /> and April 2010, and a permanent gull control program initiated in September 2010, to restrict <br /> the congregation of feeding gulls at the landfill by use of falcons and pyrotechnics (Davis 2013). <br /> Biological analyses prepared for the earlier Consolidated Forward Landfill Project FEIR <br /> (CSJCDD 2002),Austin Road Landfill Expansion Project SEIR(CSJCDD 2000), and Austin Road <br /> Landfill Expansion Project FEIR(ESA 1993) were also reviewed. — <br /> A reconnaissance-level site survey was conducted by biologists Patrick Kobernus and Michael <br /> Wood on December 8, 2008 and the site was re-visited by Mr. Wood on July 4, 2012. An <br /> additional reconnaissance-level site survey was conducted by biologist Josh Phillips on July 1, <br /> 2014. Focused botanical or wildlife studies following published protocols were not performed <br /> as part of this analysis; such surveys were not warranted due to onsite habitat conditions or r <br /> other factors. <br />