Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.F-21 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Pursuant to the Clean Water Act52 and the guidelines of the U.S. Environmental Protection <br /> Agency (USEPA53), an applicant for a federal permit to conduct any activity that may result in <br /> discharge into navigable waters must provide a certification from the Regional Water Quality <br /> Control Board (RWQCB) that such discharge would comply with the state water quality <br /> standards.5' The RWQCB focuses on ensuring that projects do not adversely affect the <br /> "beneficial uses" associated with waters of the State.55 In most cases, the RWQCB seeks to <br /> protect these beneficial uses by requiring the integration water quality control measures into <br /> projects that could result in discharge into waters of the State. <br /> Under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act56, the RWQCB is authorized to regulate — <br /> the discharge of waste that could affect the quality of the State's waters. "Waste" is broadly <br /> defined by the Porter-Cologne Act to include "sewage and any and all other waste substances, <br /> liquid, solid, gaseous, or radioactive, associated with human habitation, or of human or animal <br /> origin, or from any producing, manufacturing, or processing operation of whatever <br /> nature....i57. Concentrated silt or sediment associated with human habitation and harmful to <br /> the aquatic environment is "waste" under this section. In addition, the California Attorney <br /> General has interpreted this definition to include extraction of sand,gravel or other minerals <br /> from a streambed,because it may cause an increase in turbidity and silt in the waters of the <br /> stream downstream from the operations. Therefore, even if a project does not require a federal <br /> permit(i.e., a Nationwide Permit from the USACE), it may nevertheless require review by and - <br /> approval of the RWQCB. <br /> Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures _ <br /> Criteria of Significance <br /> CEQA Guidelines58 establish certain "mandatory findings of significance" that function as <br /> significance thresholds affecting certain biological resources. Pursuant to that section, a project <br /> is deemed to have a significant environmental effect if the project would: <br /> • Substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; <br /> • Cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels; <br /> • Threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community;or <br /> • Substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened <br /> species. <br /> In addition,based upon the checklist in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, implementation of <br /> the proposed project would have a significant impact if it were to cause: <br /> 52 CWA,Section 401 <br /> 53 CWA Section 404(b)(1) <br /> 5'CCR Title 23,Sections 3830,et seq. _ <br /> 51 Waters of the State are defined as"any surface water or groundwater,including saline waters,within <br /> the boundaries of the state." (California Water Code Section 13050(e).)These waters include nearly every <br /> and all surface or ground water in the state,or tributaries thereto, and include drainage features outside <br /> USACE jurisdiction(e.g., dry and ephemeral/seasonal stream beds and channels,etc.,isolated wetlands <br /> such as vernal pools,seeps,springs and other groundwater-supplied wetlands,etc.,and storm drains and <br /> flood control channels. <br /> 56 Cal. Water Code Sections 13000-14920 <br /> 57 Cal.Water Code Section 13050 <br /> 58 Section 15065 <br />