My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0800105
>
SU0007861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 11:37:03 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:03:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007861
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0800105
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
APN
20106003
ENTERED_DATE
8/11/2009 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/24/2009 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\EIR PA-0800105\NOP.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
687
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Environmental Impact Report Page III-26 - <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill Expansion <br /> I <br /> The typical design for a solidification basin is a below-grade reinforced concrete structure placed <br /> outside the refuse fill area. The facility typically consists of two side-by-side chambers <br /> approximately 30 feet by 20 feet,with a depth of ten to 16 feet. The thickness of the basin structure <br /> would be designed to support the weight of the mixing equipment. The basin would include , <br /> concrete aprons and water stops(curbs)to prevent spillage outside the facility. The apron would ��` <br /> be graded to drain towards the basin so that liquids(precipitation or spillage of liquids)falling on ; <br /> the apron would flow into the basin. Gravel-surfaced drive areas would be placed around the <br /> aprons to facilitate traffic and safety in all weather conditions. Handrails and curbs would be <br /> placed on all sides of the basin. Escape ladders and flotation rings would be provided on each <br /> chamber. The solidification area would be fenced for security and safety purposes. Earthen berms <br /> would be set around the facility to divert surface water run-on. A detection/collection system-and <br /> liner may also be utilized beneath the basin. <br /> Subject to regulatory approval,the waste solidification operation would relocated as needed to <br /> accommodate development of landfill disposal areas. <br /> Changes to Quantification of Beneficial Reuse Materials Materials Delivered to MRF and <br /> Limited Reuse Soil <br /> The Forward Landfill accepts materials for beneficial uses such as Alternative Daily Cover(ADC), <br /> wet weather deck preparation, internal haul road improvements,and earthen drainage control <br /> improvements. These materials include green waste, ash and cement kiln dust, treated automobile <br /> shredder waste,shredded tires and"beneficial use" inert materials other than soil(concrete, <br /> asphalt,roofing tile, other rock/aggregate-based materials,etc.). <br /> Soils not requiring disposal and which are utilized for beneficial reuse are classified prior to use at <br /> the landfill. Limited reuse soils are both(1) "contaminated soils" which do not meet LEA <br /> requirements,and(2)Class II waste (or designated wastes)based on criteria established by the <br /> RWQCB. Limited reuse soils can only be used within a lined Class II landfill cell. Incoming <br /> limited reuse soil quantities would be recorded and the amount received(in tons)would be <br /> counted against the maximum permitted tonnage(8,668 tpd). The landfill averages approximately <br /> 750 tons per day (tpd)of limited reuse soil with occasional peaks of 3,200 tpd. <br /> The MRF located in the southeast corner of the site is governed by a separate Solid Waste Facility <br /> Permit(SWFP) from the landfill operation at the site. The MRF's SWFP effectively limits material <br /> Wever that tonnage is currently counted as part of the landfill's <br /> tpd;ho Y <br /> o the MRF to 500 , g <br /> livered t <br /> de P separately from the landfill <br /> limit. Forward <br /> Landfill proposes to count MRF tonnage sep y <br /> daily tonnage P P <br /> tonnage,leaving the individual facility limits in place. The maximum inflow rate to the MRF <br /> would remain 500 tpd. The maximum inflow rate to the landfill would remain 8,668 tpd,but <br /> would apply only to waste disposed. <br /> In addition to the 8,668 tpd of waste,500 tpd of material delivered to the MRF, and 40,000 gallons <br /> of high moisture content waste (as discussed in Solidification of High Moisture Content Wastes, <br /> above),Forward proposes to accept a maximum of 5,487 tpd of beneficial reuse materials. It is <br /> unlikely that the maximum permitted quantity of all these materials(8,668 tpd disposal, 5,487 tpd <br /> beneficial reuse materials,500 tpd to the MRF,and 40,000 gpd of sludge and liquid wastes)would <br /> be accepted on any given day due to the vehicle count limitations. <br /> i.�i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.