Laserfiche WebLink
Page IV.D-12 <br /> act Report Pa <br /> Draft Environmental p p g <br /> Forward Landfill Expansion <br /> 1., <br /> OPR Proposed Amendments to the CEQA Guidelines <br /> FOn April 13,2009, OPR submitted to the Secretary for Natural Resources its proposed <br /> amendments to the CEQA Guidelines for GHG emissions, as required by Public <br /> Resources Code section 21083.05 (Senate Bill 97). These proposed.CEQA Guideline <br /> amendments would provide guidance to public agencies regarding the analysis and <br /> mitigation of the effects of GHG emissions in draft CEQA documents. The Natural <br /> Resources Agency will conduct formal rulemaking in 2009, prior to certifying and <br /> adopting the amendments, as required by Senate Bill 97. <br /> Proposed amendments include a new section(15064.4) to assist lead agencies in <br /> determining the significance of the GHG impacts. This section urges lead agencies to <br /> quantify, where possible,the GHG emissions of proposed projects. In addition to <br /> quantification, this section recommends consideration of several other qualitative factors <br /> that may be used in determination of significance including: (1) the extent to which the <br /> F project may increase or reduce GHG emissions as compared to the existing <br /> environmental setting; (2) whether the GHG emissions exceed a threshold of significance <br /> that the lead agency determines applies to the project; and (3) the extent to which the <br /> project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a Statewide, <br /> regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions. <br /> The proposed amendments include a new subdivision 15064.7(c)to clarify that in <br /> developing thresholds of significance,a lead agency may appropriately review thresholds <br /> I developed by other public agencies, including the CARE s recommended CEQA <br /> Thresholds, or suggested by other experts, such as the California Air Pollution Control <br /> Officers Association, so long as any threshold chosen is supported by substantial <br /> evidence. <br /> { The proposed amendments also include a new subdivision 15130(f) to emphasize that the <br /> effects of GHG emissions are cumulative, and should be analyzed when the incremental <br /> contribution of those emissions may be cumulatively considerable. In addition, the <br /> proposed amendments add a new set of environmental checklist questions(VII. <br /> F Greenhouse Gas Emissions)to the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. The new set includes <br /> the following two questions: <br /> FWill the project: <br /> a) Generate GHG emissions,either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant <br /> impact on the environment? <br /> 1 b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for <br /> the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG? <br /> California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) <br /> In January 2008, the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association(CAPCOA) <br /> issued a "white paper" on evaluating and addressing GHGs under CEQA (CAPCOA, <br /> 2008). This resource guide was prepared to support local governments as they develop <br /> F their programs and policies around climate change issues. The paper is not a guidance <br /> document. It is not intended to dictate or direct how any agency chooses to address GHG <br /> emissions. Rather, it is intended to provide a common platform of information about key <br /> elements of CEQA as they pertain to GHG,including an analysis of different approaches <br /> to setting significance thresholds. <br /> F <br /> FI <br />