Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Environmental Impact Report Page IV.D-13 <br /> Forward Landfill Expansion <br /> The paper notes that for a variety of reasons local agencies may decide not to have a <br /> CEQA threshold. Local agencies may also decide to assess projects on a case-by-case <br /> basis when the projects come forward. The paper also discusses a range of GHG emission <br /> thresholds that could be used. The range of thresholds discusses includes a GHG <br /> threshold of zero and several non-zero thresholds. Non-zero thresholds include <br /> percentage reductions for new projects that would allow the state to meet its goals for <br /> GHG emissions reductions by 2020 and perhaps 2050. These would be determined by a <br /> comparison of new emissions versus business as usual emissions and the reductions <br /> required would be approximately 30 percent to achieve 2020 goals and 90 percent <br /> (effectively immediately)to achieve the more aggressive 2050 goals. These goals could be <br /> varied to apply differently to new project, by economic sector,or by region in the state. <br /> Other non-zero thresholds are discussed in the paper include: <br /> • 900 metric tons/year CO2e (a market capture approach); <br /> • 10,000 metric tons/year CO2e (potential CARB mandatory reporting level with <br /> Cap and Trade); <br /> • 25,000 metric tons/year CO2e (the CARB mandatory reporting level for the <br /> statewide emissions inventory); <br /> • 40,000 to 50,000 metric tons/year CO2e (regulated emissions inventory capture— <br /> using percentages equivalent to those used in air districts for criteria air <br /> pollutants), <br /> • Projects of statewide importance (9,000 metric tons/year CO2e for residential, <br /> 13,000 metric tons/year CO2e for office project, and 41,000 metric tons/year CO2e <br /> for retail projects), and <br /> • Unit-based thresholds and efficiency-based thresholds that were not quantified in <br /> the report. <br /> CARB Draft GHG Significance Thresholds <br /> On October 24,2008, CARB released its Preliminary Draft Staff Proposal on <br /> Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse <br /> Gases under the California Environmental Quality Act for review and public comment. <br /> The Proposal identifies benchmarks or standards that assist lead agencies in the <br /> significance determination for industrial, residential, and commercial projects. The <br /> Proposal currently focuses on two sectors for which local agencies are typically the CEQA <br /> lead agency: industrial projects; and residential and commercial projects. Future <br /> proposals will focus on transportation projects, large dairies and power plant projects. <br /> In summary, the Proposal recommends: <br /> • In general, categorical exemptions will continue to apply. <br /> • If GHGs are adequately addressed at the programmatic level (i.e., consistent with <br /> regional GHG budgets), the impact of certain individual projects can be found to <br /> be insignificant. <br /> • Industrial projects below the operational emissions level (7,000 metric tons/year <br /> CO2e)that also meet performance standards for construction can be found to be <br /> less than significant. <br /> • Residential and commercial projects below the operational emissions level <br /> (unspecified as of December 2008) that also meet performance standards for <br /> construction,energy, water,waste and transportation can be found to be less than <br /> significant. <br />