Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Environmental Impact Report Page IV.D-23 <br /> Forward Landfill Expansion <br /> Table IV.D-3 <br /> Project Net Criteria Pollutant Emissions (tons per year) <br /> Future Project-Current Actual (Flare) 61 292 78 205 31 <br /> Future Project-Current Actual (LFG Engines) 127 1 894 221 204 31 <br /> Future Project-Current Permitted (Flare) 36 195 51 105 21 <br /> Future Project-Current Permitted(LFG Engines) 101 797 194 104 21 <br /> CEQA Threshold 10 NA 10 10 NA <br /> Exceeds Threshold Yes Yes Yes <br /> Stationary Source Emissions (Requiring Offsets) <br /> Future Project-Current Actual (Flare) 53 288 72 49 31 <br /> Future Project-Current Actual (LFG Engines) 118 891 215 48 31 <br /> Future Project-Current Permitted (Flare) 32 193 48 33 21 <br /> Future Project-Current Permitted(LFG Engines) 97 796 191 32 21 <br /> Mobile Source Emissions <br /> Future Project-Current Actual 9 4 6 <1 <1 <br /> Future Project-Current Permitted 4 2 3 <1 <br /> Fugitive Dust Emissions <br /> Future Project-Current Actual <br /> Future Project-Current Permitted 72 <br /> SOURCE: SCS Engineers,2009 <br /> Impact IV.D.4: Odor Impact <br /> As bacterial decomposition proceeds, odoriferous compounds can escape from the <br /> landfill surface through cracks in the surface cover. Other possible sources of odors are <br /> the actual wastes. Some household and consumer products contain substances with <br /> distinctive odors. The major contribution to odors comes from two groups of <br /> compounds: the first group is dominated by esters and organosulfurs, and the second <br /> group consists of alkyl benzenes and limonene. <br />