Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Environmental P <br /> Impact Report Page IV.G-2 ' <br /> p <br /> Forward Landfill Expansion <br /> construction within fault zones. It provides guidance for how active faults should be identified, <br /> defines relevant terms, and establishes an approval process for proposed buildings in active <br /> earthquake areas. The law requires the State of California to establish regulatory zones around <br /> surface traces of active faults and to issue the appropriate maps. It also requires a geologic <br /> investigation in the event of new construction, to ensure that it will not be located on a fault <br /> zone. However,the Alquist-Priolo Act only addresses hazards associated with surface fault <br /> rupture, and does not address other hazards associated with earthquakes (the Seismic Hazards <br /> Mapping Act addresses these other hazards). There are no Alquist-Priolo zones within the plan <br /> area. <br /> The Seismic Hazards Mapping Act <br /> The Seismic Hazards Mapping Act was passed in 1990 to addresses seismic hazards such as <br /> strong ground shaking, soil liquefaction, and earthquake-related landslides. This act requires <br /> the State of California to identify and map areas that are at risk for these (and related)hazards. <br /> Cities and counties are also required to regulate development in the mapped seismic hazard <br /> zones. The primary method of regulating construction in these areas is through the permit <br /> process, and a permit cannot be issued until a geological investigation is completed. Many <br /> counties, including San Joaquin County, still refer to the Seismic Hazard Zones in the seismic <br /> safety element of their general plan of 1992. However, the US Geological Survey currently <br /> considers Seismic Hazard Zones obsolete. The 1997 UCB Code was the last to use these zones. <br /> California has adopted the 2007 California Building Code, so officially these Seismic Zones are <br /> not in use expect to reference general seismic risk. The USGS directs uses a more complex mix <br /> of variables to compute"probabalistic ground motion maps", that started coming out in 2008 <br /> though these are not available for the project area yet. <br /> California Integrated Waste Management Board and Central-Valley Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board <br /> The California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and Central Valley Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB) oversee the design elements of the waste management <br /> units (WMUs) and supporting ancillary functions -such as the materials recovery facility, soil <br /> borrow areas, composting areas, and storage and support areas-that comprise the landfill. <br /> The CIWMB and RWQCB stipulate design criteria for the proposed additional expansion area <br /> Class IT WMU native material permeability, liner and leachate collection system, and slope <br /> stability potential at the site. The landfill design must meet California Code of Regulations <br /> (CCR) Title 27 requirements. Design criteria for seismic events is provided by the California <br /> Division of Mines and Geology's (CDMG)estimates of peak horizontal ground accelerations <br /> (PHGAs) associated with active earthquake faults near enough to the site to have an impact. <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> The Public Health and Safety Element of the 2010 San Joaquin County General Plan, adopted in <br /> 1992, incorporates health and safety considerations for Seismic and Geological Hazards. In June <br /> 2008 the County began a 36-month process to update the 1992 General Plan. Relevant <br /> subsections (VI-V5) discuss the seismic and geologic hazards. <br /> Seismic hazards include earthquake-induced ground rupture, ground shaking, liquefaction, or <br /> water movement. Strong ground shaking typically results in structural damage to buildings <br /> and slope instability, and can also induce liquefaction. General geologic hazards include <br /> subsidence,erosion, expansive soils, and slope instability. <br />