My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0800105
>
SU0007861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 11:37:03 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:03:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007861
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0800105
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
APN
20106003
ENTERED_DATE
8/11/2009 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/24/2009 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\EIR PA-0800105\NOP.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
687
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Environmental Impact Re <br /> Draft E ort Page IV.G-3 p p <br /> Forward Landfill Expansion <br /> �1 <br /> The seismic element of the San Joaquin County General Plan proposes to lessen these potential <br /> hazards through: <br /> Conducting an evaluation of potential hazards as a precondition to development; <br /> Prohibiting the location of critical use facilities within 1/8 mile of any known active <br /> fault; <br /> • Requiring facilities within ahigh-seismicity zone to be capable of withstanding the <br /> .,, maximum credible earthquake within that area;and <br /> • Curbing subsidence in the Delta area through regional and local efforts. <br />� x <br /> Topography <br /> The regional topography is a relatively featureless plain of the Great Valley. Before <br /> development, the land surface was at an elevation of approximately 40 feet above mean sea <br /> level (amsl). The original topography has been modified by the landfill operations at the <br /> landfill by the creation of both depressions (excavations for borrow pits and sedimentation <br /> ponds, etc) and topographic highs created by the landfill cells. The excavation areas are <br /> approximately 15 feet amsl. As of April 2008 (the most recent available measurement), the <br /> highest point at the northern hill of the landfill (former Austin Road Landfill) was <br /> approximately 137 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL),and the highest point at the southern hill <br /> of the landfill (original Forward Landfill) was approximately 194 feet. The current permit <br /> allows Forward to fill to a maximum of 210 feet above MSL. The proposed new expansion <br /> -•ti areas revised permit would permit a maximum of 183 feet above MSL in the expansion area. <br /> The expansion would be staged over 25 years, as landfill deposits are not evenly distributed <br /> over time. Some areas have developed more quickly than others based on proximity,landfill <br /> administration, refuse segregation plans, and location of borrow material. <br /> Soil Properties and Conditions <br /> Subsurface soil properties beneath the landfill and in the immediate vicinity of the landfill, <br /> including the expansion areas have been evaluated in numerous previous soil investigations as <br /> 1 5 of the joint Technical Document TD 2007 . While thee investigation <br /> documented m Table J (J ) g <br /> do not focus on the new expansion area the general soil properties can be extrapolated to the <br /> new expansion areas within the context of the natural heterogeneous nature of the soil <br /> M properties. <br /> The soils encountered during the geotechnical investigations generally consist of interbedded <br /> layers of sand, silt,and lean clay. The cohesive materials are generally of very stiff to hard <br /> consistency. The cohesionless materials can be characterized as dense to very dense. Because <br /> the sediments at the site were deposited as fluvial floodplain and channel deposits, the soil <br /> deposits at the site were found to be heterogeneous and laterally and vertically discontinuous. <br /> However,based on the 1992 CH2M HILL investigation, the subsurface soils properties were <br /> summarized into general layers. Beginning at the existing ground surface (approximately <br /> elevation 39 feet amsl), the six layers, from the surface on down, are as follows: <br /> • A 10- to 15-foot layer of light brown material ranging from lean clay to silt and silty <br /> clay. This layer is dry and very stiff to hard in consistency, with moisture contents <br /> typically at or below the plastic limit. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.