Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Environmental Impact Report Page IV.J-2 <br /> Forward Landfill Expansion <br /> within a mile radius of the project area;there are a total of two historical archaeological <br /> sites: Sjo-19914 is described as an historic artifact scatter probably associated with the <br /> John Alexander Horn homestead (Gerike 1991). The only other recorded historic <br /> resource is Sjo-256H, segments of the historic French Camp Road found south of the <br /> project area. <br /> A visual inspection of the project area was conducted by Holman &Associates on <br /> January 8,2009 after contact with Landfill personnel to gain access to the parcel. As <br /> stated above, the parcel, still in agricultural use, had been recently disced, removing <br /> almost all vegetation from the surface. The visible soils consist of a sticky brown to <br /> black clay loam containing scant evidence of natural gravels. Other than a line of oak <br /> trees found along the banks of South Littlejohns Creek, the parcel is completely devoid <br /> of other types of native vegetation. <br /> The visual inspection was accomplished by walking 1.00 foot transects from south to <br /> north across the entire parcel. A more intensive inspection was given to the banks of <br /> South Littlejohns Creek,which is cut deeply into the level fields;the bottom of the creek <br /> was between 10 and 15 feet below the surface of the fields on either side of it. The <br /> ground surface was inspected for any evidence of Native American use and/or <br /> habitation: darker than surrounding soils of a friable nature, any evidence of fires (ash, <br /> charcoal, fire altered rock or earth), any concentrations of stone, bone or fresh water <br /> shellfish, and any artifacts of these materials. <br /> No evidence of archaeological deposits, either historic or prehistoric, were found <br /> anywhere inside the project area. It should be pointed out that despite the negative <br /> findings of the two previous archaeological surveys of the-landfill,both authors <br /> cautioned that there may be buried archaeological deposits on the property, in particular <br /> in close proximity to the natural drainages found there. <br /> Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> Impact J.1. Potential impacts on buried cultural resources. Although no evidence of <br /> cultural resources was found at either the Forward Landfill site (including the former <br /> Austin Road Landfill), or the proposed expansion parcel, there is the potential for <br /> subsurface archaeological deposits or human remains along the portion of the South <br /> Branches of the South Fork of Littlejohns Creek proposed for realignment. These could <br /> be disturbed or destroyed by project-related excavation and filling. Holman& <br /> Associates (2009) concluded that there is a moderate possibility that excavation for the <br /> new creek bed (to the south and in close proximity to the existing natural course of <br /> South Littlejohns) might uncover buried archaeological resources that would have been <br /> situated inside the riparian zone of the creek. <br /> Mitigation 1.1. An archaeological monitor shall be retained to observe the excavation of <br /> the new creek channel along the southern border of the parcel in order to identify <br /> potentially buried resources. In the event that any of the archaeological site indicators <br /> described above are found, work should be halted within a zone established by the <br /> project archaeologist until a plan for the evaluation of the resource under CEQA <br /> guidelines has been submitted to the appropriate permitting agency for approval. <br /> If any potential cultural resources are encountered during the creek relocation <br /> excavation, the following measures shall be implemented: <br />