Laserfiche WebLink
Page 66 <br /> After adjustments, the proposed expansion project is estimated to generate a total of 38 trips (2 inbound <br /> and 2 outbound autos), (17 inbound and 17 outbound trucks) during the AM peak hour and the PM peak <br /> hour. The proposed expansion project is estimated to generate a total of 252 daily trips, with 8 inbound <br /> trips and 8 outbound auto trips, and 118 inbound trips and 118 outbound truck trips. <br /> The resulting daily truck traffic for.the proposed site is estimated at 90 percent for both inbound and <br /> outbound traffic. <br /> Project Trip Distribution and Assignment <br /> The directional distribution of approach and departure traffic for non-truck trips were determined based <br /> on the BNSF Traffic Study. Trip distribution for the truck traffic is based on existing truck traffic <br /> patterns to and from the site. For autos, it was estimated that 87% would arrive and depart from the <br /> northbound direction (i.e. tolfrom French Camp Road and Austin Road south of the site) and the <br /> remaining 13%will arrive and depart from the southbound direction (i.e. to/from Arch Road & Mariposa <br /> Road to the north of the site). For truck distribution, it was estimated that 90% of trucks using the site <br /> would arrive and depart from the southbound direction (i.e. to/from the Arch Road & Mariposa Road). <br /> The remaining 10% would arrive and depart from the northbound direction (i.e. to/from French Camp <br /> Road&. Austin Road south of the site). Figure D4 shows the percentage trip distribution and assignment <br /> for the proposed project. <br /> Intersection Level of Service Analysis <br /> The project-generated trips were added to the existing traffic volumes, and a level of service analysis was <br /> performed using the Traffix software. The sum of existing volumes, approved project trips and project <br /> generated trips for the study peak conditions are shown in Figure D-5. The project condition intersection <br /> geometry and control are the same as in the background condition. The analysis was performed for the <br /> four study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The results of the intersection level <br /> of service calculations are summarized in Table D-6. <br /> Impact D.I. Decrease in Level of Service at Austin Rd./Mariposa Rd.intersection <br /> The results of the LOS analysis indicate that under project conditions, all study intersections will operate <br /> at acceptable levels of service (LOS) "D" or better with the exception of the Austin Rd/Mariposa Rd <br /> intersection, which would operate at unacceptable LOS "F" during the AM Peak hour. The LOS <br /> calculations for the project condition are provided in Appendix B. <br /> Mitigation Measure Dl_ In order to mitigate the substandard operating condition under project and <br /> cumulative conditions, the intersection of Austin Road& Mariposa Road will require traffic signals. The <br /> County shall install the signals, and the landfill owner shall pay a fair share contribution to County for the <br /> their installation. The signals shall be installed when warranted. Installation of traffic signals would <br /> improve the level of service at the Austin Road/Mariposa Road intersection to the levels shown on Table <br /> D-7: Mitigation analysis sheets are provided in Appendix B. - <br /> is not ful responsible for the installation of traffic signal at <br /> The Austin Road Landfrll project expansion ly po <br /> this location. This is because the unacceptable LOS is already projected under background conditions. <br /> However, the Austin Road Landfill will add some more traffic to the already congested intersection. <br /> Therefore, a fair share percentage of the project traffic is calculated at the Austin Rd/Mariposa Road <br /> intersection to determine its share of costs for the improvements. The fair share was determined by <br /> GRASSETT7 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING <br />