My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004593
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BRANDT
>
13751
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-00-01 (TE)
>
SU0004593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 10:10:47 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:35:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004593
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
SU-00-01 (TE)
STREET_NUMBER
13751
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
BRANDT
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
APN
01906029
ENTERED_DATE
8/6/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
13751 E BRANDT RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/4/2004 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\B\BRANDT\13751\SU-00-01\SU0004593\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> San Joaquine Community Development Dept. <br /> Development Services Division MAY Z 8 200, <br /> 1810 E.Hazelton Ave. <br /> Stockton,Ca 95205 �.ommR' U�yervRmenr�� <br /> R� <br /> May 17,2001 <br /> 1 <br /> TO WHOM IT.MAY CONCERN: <br /> 1 <br /> You have asked for the impute of the public regarding the proposed 309 homes at Brandt and <br /> Jack Tone Rd. <br /> Our concern is adding traffic to an already well traveled Hwy. 88. Do we clog it further and than <br /> need to expand after it is impossible to navigate? Are we to follow Tracy's over population explosion? <br /> Which has put them in a dire straight with their transportation both on the highways and in town? <br /> Our concern is the utilities that are already in what we are told is in crises;to the point of blackouts. <br /> How do we justify adding to that burden? Where are these resources to accommodate this new community? In a farming <br /> community where water is paramount for the farmer will this create a problem for them and for residential dwellings? <br /> Where are the resources to accommodate these new homes? <br /> Have we factored in the services needed for such a large new community that will need schools,crime <br /> protection,fire protection and medical emergencies'agencies? What about new business such as gas <br /> stations,food and clothing. Are we prepared for this increase on all services? <br /> Are you planning to increase our taxes? If not how are we to sustain this new community? <br /> Why was so little time allotted for consideration,inquiry with agencies concerned,and response <br /> time for all those concerned? <br /> r <br /> We would appreciate an answer to our concerns plus and itemized dollar explanation to our concerns in <br /> such an increase. <br /> the B 309-home <br /> �--� subdivision begins <br /> approval process <br /> Mr. &Mrs. James Dunniway <br /> 14144 Bluff Dr. A Lockeford residential sub- <br /> Lockeford,CA 95237 division including 309 homes will be <br /> Note sent registered reviewed May 30., 2001, by the <br /> vel <br /> en: stamped,self addressed envelope county's development committee <br /> cc. The News before moving the subdivision plan <br /> to the county Planning Commission. <br /> Public comments must be re- <br /> ceived by the Community Develop- <br /> ment Department no later than <br /> Wednesday,May 23,2001. <br /> Tabbed as"Lockeford Oaks," <br /> the project site is Iocated on the <br /> northeast comer of Brandt and Jack <br /> Tone roads. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.