Laserfiche WebLink
i4k <br /> S.R.88/S.R.12/Br <br /> andt Road intersection - is projected to operate at "Existing plus Approved Projects" <br /> unsignalized AM peak hour LOS "E"conditions and PM peak hour LOS 'T" <br /> con <br /> intersection isnot projected to meet Caltrans peak-hour-volume Warrant-11 (Rural AreasditiOe either during <br /> , the <br /> "Existing plus Approved Projects" AM peak hour or during the PM peak hour. As such, dza io the <br /> this intersection is not found needed under "Existing plus the <br /> Projects"conditions s However,on of <br /> both capacity and safety reasons, itis recommended that this intersection be continue to be moat for <br /> traffic growth through the full build-out of all approved and pending study aiea developments tared for ' <br /> signal were to be installed at this intersection under "Existing pias Approved Projects" <br /> P If a traffic <br /> PM peak hour LOS "A" operating conditions are projected. 1 conditions,AM and <br /> No other:intersection mitigation measures are found necessary under "Existing plus A <br /> conditions. P pproved Projects" <br /> •Roadway Segments <br /> All study roadwaysegments g me <br /> nts are projected to operate at acceptable daily levels-of-service un <br /> Plus Approved Projects" conditions. der "Existing Approved projects" conditions. No mitigation measures are found necessary under "Existing plus <br /> EXISTING PLUS APPROVED PROJECTS PLUS PROTECT CONDITIONS <br /> Inter suns <br /> S.R.881S.R.121Jack Tone Road intersection - <br /> recommended under Existing conditions is Projected ed o pinstallation de suf{�eat capacity t <br /> traffic gnat at this intersection as <br /> I` demands under "Existing plus Approved Projects plus Project" conditions. P ry o accommodate traffic <br /> f "Existing plus Approved Projects plus Project" conditions, AM peak hour OS 'the traffic signal under <br /> LOS "C" operating conditions are projected. Based u B and PM peak hour <br /> traffic growth(of 200 vehicles)over"ExistingPlus Approved pan the project's contribution to PM peak hour <br /> at this intersection, the project's fair-share a cost Ofimprovements at this intersection is estimated <br /> j traffic volumes(of 1,786 vehicles) <br /> 2001(1786+200) = 10.19 . At an estimated cost of$150,000 for installation of a traffic to be <br /> signal at this <br /> intersection, the project's cost fair-share is estimated to be$15,150. <br /> S.R.Project" <br /> u; si2/Brana►t Road intersection-is projected to operate at"Existing plus Approved <br /> Project"unsignalized AM and PM Peak hour LO pP Projects las <br /> S "F" P <br /> meet Caltrans conditions an <br /> speak-hour-volume Warrant-11 d the intersection is also protected to <br /> Projects plus Project"AM and PM (Rural Areas) both during the "Existing plus Approved <br /> recommended that a traffic signal be installed at rthis intersection under "Eboth xiistin and safety concerns, it is <br /> Plus Project" conditions. With the installation of a traffic signal at this intersection <br /> g plus Approved Projects <br /> Approved Projects plus Project" conditions, AM and PM peak hour LOS "A"ion under <br /> "Existing <br /> plus <br /> projected: Based upon the project's contribution g tions are <br /> do <br /> E n to PM <br /> Existing peak <br /> tin hour <br /> g Plus Approved Projects" P r traffic growth of 159 vehicles) <br /> J traffic volumes(of estim vehicles}at this intersection,the p oect's faire. <br /> share of cost of improvements at this intersection is estimated to <br /> be 159/(1779+159 <br /> estimated cost of$150,000 for installation of a traffic signal at this intersection,the Project's cost fair- <br /> is estimated to be $12,300. ) 8.2%. At an <br /> share <br /> Pra'ect;Drivew Intersections <br />' • All driveways y (Driveways#1,42 and#3)from/to the subdivision that intersect with off-site roadway <br /> I ockeford Oaks Subdivision Tn3�'tc Impact Study <br /> San Joaquin County Page 27 <br /> R407FS002.DOC25-6450-14 <br />