Laserfiche WebLink
6-01 03:47P CaItX' s District -10 209 948 7194 P.02 <br /> STATE(If IltiSINESI%'I'R,%NSPOStT,%1'10,N AND 11101.7-MM.ACV-NCV GRAY DAIS,Gavernell- <br /> DEPAWYNTENT OF TRANSPORTNFION <br /> P.1).I$I)X 21N1(1191;1.U.t 1 1ARTIAt WAY' <br /> SWWK10N.CA 0:111 <br /> R1 <br /> J Line 6, 200 1 <br /> Pre-Application <br /> SU-00-01 <br /> Lockeford Oaks Subdivision <br /> Mr. Jim Van Buren <br /> Community I)cveloprnent Department <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> 1810 E. I lazclton Avenue <br /> Stockton. CA 9520.5 <br /> Dcar Mr. Van Buren: <br /> Thank you I-Or the opportunity to review the pre-application (SLI-00-00 on a M. 1( r Sub livi.ion <br /> application ip create u 309 residential lo -m the northeast comer of Brandt and Jackt subdivision I <br /> Tone: Roads. Lockcii)rd (APN 019-060-29). Cattrans has reviewed the application and <br /> associated tratlic studv and requests the following coininents are considered as conditions voi* <br /> A <br /> approval 10r tile propose project <br /> "Traffic Study, page 14, Trip purpose, distrilmution and assignment. the directional trip <br /> distribution siams. -approximately 20% ol'the projectgccrated trips %voul(I tette-e north'on <br /> SR 88!'12 and would be absorbed locally by job. Shopping and schooling opportunities- wilhin <br /> the LockelZird community.'. It is Caltrans' undcrstanding that the Lockef-Ord. School is <br /> already at capacity, and all nmr students are being bused to theTokay ('oltillY. Live Oak, and <br /> Victor Schools, Caltrans wishes to cillphasize that those triPS would recluire southbound <br /> travel along State Route (SR) 88 korn the proposed lmjccr site. hi addition. due it, dxi <br /> limited shopping and employment opportunities within the 4-1 ockcibrd Community- arca. <br /> anti the relatively I, I I ` tocktoti <br /> greater opportunities for jobs and shopping existing 'it the Ludi.-S <br /> area, Cahrans feels the majority of peak hour vehicle trips will use the southbound Sit 88 <br /> route of travel. mercliore. Caltrans wishes J() CillillialdZe tII;11 the 111.1111ber of vehicles <br /> predicted it),usesimthbound SR 88 in the trallic Study appear to be underestimated. Caltrans <br /> Suggests that the truffic study be remaluated to determine the actual impacts to SR 88 and its <br /> Intersections with Jack Totic Road, Brandt Road and SR 12. <br /> 0 Also on page -For trips hcu'cd <br /> 14 under the same heading, the traffic study clairn-s. � d south on <br /> SR 81811the northerly Jack Tone Road route to obtain access to tile highway is proicetcd to <br /> be more attractive than the Brandt Road Route'. By what basis is the tiorilicrly route decilled <br /> more-`attractive'"-'.. The prt�jcct diagram shows two of(lie three driNrmays of:the project Site <br /> are closer in proximity to Brandt Road/SR 88 than.Jack Tone Rd! SR S.S. Cattrans feet-,that. <br /> out of the 1*7-,; outhound AM peak hour trips generated fi-oill this proposal (Table 8, trip <br />