Laserfiche WebLink
Ju6-06-01 03c48P Ca7t�'- ns District 10 209, 'x,48 7194 P.03 <br /> Mr. Jim Van Buren <br /> .lune 6.2001 <br /> )'age 2 <br /> generation.page 14), 13 vehicles using the Brandt Road/SR 88 interseclion is a signitieatttfy <br /> tow number(Figure 6,intersection #2). <br /> • Included in the Level of Service(LOS)workshecis, beginning on 6-i. existing P,ti4 17cak hour <br /> conditions, it PIIF factor of 1.00 taas used in the analysis of all intersections. Cahrans <br /> rcyucsts jutititicatiutt tar Utiitts: this 1actor in all relative analyses, as this may alter the actual <br /> intersection dclav times. <br /> • Figure T, E.xisling intersection 'Traffic Volumes. and Figure 4. Existing Plus Approved <br /> Projects Intersection Traffic Volumes. Neither at'these figures shows any change in the <br /> number of vehicles cniering:leaving intersections f & 2 (luring the A,"Pi"! pcak hours: <br /> These number~ shall he adjusted to accurately rcfleu the trallic -encratud at these <br /> intersections. <br /> • Page x, Existing Plus Approved Projects Conditions. Caltrans requests that Sri-0I-16 <br /> (sell-storage lacility approximatei_v 15W tiet north of Brandt ]toad). and the adjacent Re/(ane <br /> (%R-01-4) .is included with the evaluation of' future impacts to the Sit U/12 roadway <br /> segments and allbuted intersections. Althou lh not yet approved- these projects %will be <br /> approved befiore construction begins lair the proposed project, and will contribute iii the <br /> ctmlulati%e impacts at the previously discussed State I lighw y facilities. <br /> As a resuh tlt• the above infilrnzation, Caltrans ha determined that a re-evaluation an(For <br /> correction elf the trallic data for this proposal is rLquired, %with an emphasized locus (m <br /> intersection #2. In addition. Caltrans rc(lucsts it traffic study to analyxV clic intersection of State <br /> Routes 12 and NX. Potential queuing of vehicles traveling On eastbound SIt 12 at SR XX may <br /> exlnrience fiat~ delays as it result oi' southbound rill peak hour traffic leaving the proposed <br /> Ptcijc(;t along;southbound SR <br /> Additional (;Otttment5 <br /> • Figure 11. Veal- 20211 Recommended Lane Geometries and Control. No impa-m•entents <br /> are shown for either intersection l or 2 regarding the SR 88 northbound approaches to Jack <br /> Tone and 13randt Roads. As a result ol'the increase-A right turn yOlutneti rcaultinL! from the <br /> Proposed protect, Caltrans req( w-%Lk additional northbound rid- t turn lanes at the <br /> alin-ententioned intersections as part of the proposed Pr('!ject'a mitigation. <br /> • Coordination n"A% to occur betWcCll the Ctiunt.v and Caltrans tier the installatian at' the <br /> traffic signal at intcncctiun I ist <br /> >, , l al above, prior[(t proJcct construction, <br /> • A Caltrans Encroachiricnt Pc-rmit will be rtxluirccl fir any work perfbi-med within the right of <br /> way. Additional biological. arehac(s!ugicall, or other environmential studies may he required <br /> N•Is <br /> 1-1,-1%111'lc 11 .-1 fr'M:1 int l]A I.%m 13171% <br />