Laserfiche WebLink
1-7 1 C. /.J«167 T r—C1 L,pu.� <br /> I <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY ' <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> • �`.-`. - ` • 1810 E.HAZELTON AVE.,STOCKTON,CA 95205-6232 <br /> c4 �KOP�i`P PHONE:209/468.3121 FAX:2091468-3163 <br /> a <br /> February 7, 2000 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> i <br /> TO: Development Committee <br /> FROM: Jim Van Buren <br /> Senior Planner ✓'�'-' <br /> SUBJECT: MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRE-APPLICATION NO. SU-00-1 OF <br /> ERNEST E. AND IRENE F. PESTANA (CIO BAUMBACH & PIAZZA) <br /> The applicants have submitted the above referenced pre-application to subdivide a.90- <br /> acre portion of a 125-acre parcel into 319 residential lots with a Vesting Tentative Map. <br /> The proposed parcel size varies from 8,000 to 14,000 square feet with a parcel width <br /> and zoning desi <br /> average of 70 feet. The General Plana g . 9nations are Residential Low <br /> Density. The project site is located on the northeast corner of Brandt Road and Jack <br /> Tone Road, Lockeford. <br /> The Community Development Department has reviewed the pre-application and offers E <br /> the following comments: <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> At this site a subdivision, (SU-91-15)formerly known as River Oaks, and now <br /> designated as Diamond Bar subdivision, was granted approval. The subdivision's <br /> approval will expire on December 8, 2003. The subdivision was part of a proposal that <br /> was composed of 210 single-family residential lots, a 26-acre lake, a recreation center, a <br /> library/fire site, a park site and four lots containing a total of 26.9 acres that were <br /> planned to be further subdivided at a later date to accommodate 79 single-family <br /> detached clustered residences. <br /> An Environmental Impact Report (ER-90-3)was prepared and certified for the earlier <br /> project. The Environmental impact Report (EIR) addressed the following issues: <br /> j biological resources, traffic and circulation, air quality, public water supply, wastewater, <br /> I storm drainage and flood control, and schools. <br /> The EIR concluded that there were three impacts, which could not be mitigated to less <br /> than significant levels, despite adoption of the identified mitigation measures. These <br /> three impacts included the following: <br /> Development of the site will result in the loss of oak trees and oak woodland habitat. <br /> r <br />