Laserfiche WebLink
CAP Addendum:Former Fue lg Station, 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, L Page 17 <br /> rate of attenuation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in groundwater. Obviously, if <br /> 100% of the LNAPL can be extracted there will be a very rapid onset of aerobic <br /> conditions in the groundwater and that will be accompanied by greatly increased rate of <br /> groundwater remediation. <br /> From the foregoing we see that optimal performance of the proposed groundwater <br /> remediation system is controlled by the system's ability to remove LNAPL from the <br /> subsurface. If all LNAPL can be removed, remediation of groundwater by aerobic <br /> processes of natural attenuation will reduce the concentration of dissolved contaminants <br /> at a favorable rate. If less than 100% of the LNAPL can be removed, the remediation <br /> system would still generate a significant decrease in the total time required for natural <br /> attenuation to remediate groundwater because the duration of the initial anaerobic stage <br /> of the process would be reduced in direct proportion to the fraction of the total volume of <br /> LNAPL that can be extracted from the subsurface. <br /> With that understanding, it is now evident that the ability to predict the likely <br /> performance of the proposed groundwater remediation system depends on our ability to <br /> predict the quantity of LNAPL that can be extracted from the subsurface. As was <br /> discussed in Section 2.1.5, the state of the art methodologies for making such predictions <br /> a priori yield widely varying estimates This problem occurs because, although the <br /> general nature of the physical and geochemical processes that control the disposition and <br /> extraction of LNAPL are reasonably well understood, 'it is essentially impossible in <br /> practice to measure the majority the very large number of parameters that control such <br /> processes under specific in situ conditions. Unfortunately there is no more than a handful <br /> of empirical laboratory studies that have addressed the subject and those have all <br /> modeled simplified and idealized soil deposits. There.are even fewer case histories <br /> presented in the technical literature and each of those, of course, relate only to the site- <br /> specific conditions encountered by the authors. <br /> 2.4 Importance of Application of the Observational Method <br /> Experienced geotechnical engineers, when confronted with the requirement to generate <br /> solutions to problems associated with the very complex interactions of small or even <br /> large-sale phenomena that influence the behavior of earth systems or human <br /> infrastructure that interact with earth systems have long relied on application of the <br /> Observational Method when appropriate data from field observations is available. Simply <br /> stated, the Observational Method (Peck 1969) relies on observed and measured <br /> conditions as they actually occur at a specific site to predict future behavior of <br /> geotechnical systems or to assess compliance of a constructed system with its design <br /> objectives. <br /> It is essential, of course, that interpretation and use of the field observations and <br /> measurements be informed by a good understanding of all of the natural physical and <br /> geochemical processes and parameters that give rise to the observed conditions. The <br /> practitioner must also be keenly aware that apparently minor variations in geotechnical <br /> conditions from one location on a site to another can have important effects on the <br />