Laserfiche WebLink
_ t <br /> a l_ <br /> T <br /> Fappiano Lane and Canepa Road should both be 60 feet wide and not <br /> 50 feet wide. . Manuel Lopez , Department of Public Works, <br /> -- ,clarified this statement. He said the right-of-way would be 60 <br /> feet wide with a pavement width of 40 feet. Mr. .Seligman said <br /> that for the purposes of this hearing, he would agree with that <br /> "stipulation. <br /> There will be no on-site drainage but there will be a terminal <br /> .. . . drainage system. Ultimately, the drainage will flow into the <br /> Calaveras River. - This will benefit the project site as well as <br /> the surrounding property owners to alleviate existing drainage <br /> problems. <br /> -- The principal issue is growth versus no-growth. This project can- <br /> not be considered leap-frogging. It is an expansion of an area <br /> f presently zoned Rural Residential. There is no preclusion in the <br /> General Plan Policies of being able to <br /> area. The major question is whether expand a Rural Reside sial <br /> l r o <br /> r not the <br /> Marada <br /> Area <br /> residential expansion. It is the <br /> appropriate for further rural <br /> there is a demand within the North <br /> position of the applicant that <br /> Stockton Area for a logical expansion of what exists. <br /> For over 20 years this area has not been in any . significant agri- <br /> cultural utilization. <br /> ",- He- addressed the five impacts (page 16 of the staff report) . He <br /> flicant su orts the recommendation of the staff. <br /> said. the app Pp <br /> Impact Na. 1 <br /> Irreversible loss of 67 -acres of agricultural land, including 46 <br /> acres of prime soil. <br /> - ° there is ''a desire for diver- <br /> It is a social consideration; - . r <br /> ry sified housing for other people that are coming to live in <br /> ""F -`the- North Stockton' Area.'- <br /> - Impact <br /> rea.__- Im act No.. 2 <br /> i <br /> ' -project. and buildout of the study area <br /> Development of the proposed <br /> -; would provide .the impetus for future conversions of- agricultural <br /> r.r and open space lands. <br /> i If there is a demand for further expansion, `that might become <br /> an overriding impact. - The desires of the entire community <br /> within this`area, as to the extent of their needs. and social �. <br /> .M - desires,_ override this- impact. <br /> desires and economic <br />` 1 .yr t` •.�.. as _-.it :. , .. ..-- ..._. - ,;+-1.a _� - - :f _ - <br /> Impact-- <br /> No. 3 - '~ <br /> *_Land use conflicts between .agricultural activities and adjacent <br /> residential development _ y <br /> It is a question of what kind of buffer can mitigate this <br /> ". impact. Rural Residential, intent-wise and .ordinance-wise, <br /> - contemplates rural and urban development. ...:: This.. indicates <br /> rban lifestyle. That is somewhat of <br /> a mixture of rural and. u <br /> a buffer., In addition to these, there can be fencing around <br /> « the perimeter of the project- site. <br /> MINUTES. <br /> PC: 3/17/88 <br /> B45 LETTER PAGE 8 <br />