Laserfiche WebLink
_ Impact No. 4 <br /> The proposed project is inconsistent with adopted policies rela-- <br /> tive to the loss of agricultural land for residential use. <br /> ` Concurs with the staff report. _ <br /> Impact No, 5 <br /> Cumulative development would increase demands on law enforcement <br /> and schools and result in the loss of. agricultural land. <br /> Development fees take these issues into consideration. They <br /> will provide development fees for the School District. This <br /> will be for appropriate financial participation and not 100% <br /> . . payment for the increased population. <br /> Jim Carroll, one of the property owners in the project area, said he <br /> E has owned his portion of the property for ten years. This property <br /> was zoned EA-3 at one time and he agreed to GA-40 zoning in order to <br /> hold the land in large acreage for proper future development. He said <br /> they are now able to bring a project into the Morada Area that will <br /> have more community services than past Morada. Area developments. This <br /> project should relieve the drainage problems in the area. <br /> Comm. Bozzano asked about road problems.' - <br /> Mr. Carroll said .that thecirculation' in the North Stockton Area is a <br /> A . <br /> real problem. The - lot sizes for this project are 10 to 12 times the <br /> (_"*�. , _- size of that for an urban setting. The mitigation of traffic is not <br /> 4 as. great in a rural area as it would be in an urban are <br /> Jose- Alva commented that= the point of growth should be dispersion of <br /> I Agrowth for ' all parts of this County. - The developer will minimize the <br /> impactsi as much as possible. <br /> Kiritkumar_ (Kit) Patel," one of the- residents of the proposed- sub-- <br /> division; said the orchard was neglected. and the trees are nearly <br /> dead. He said he approached five farmers and they were not interested <br /> in farming hist, land. <br /> OPPONENTS: Don- Borba, 6381 Canepa Road, no <br /> that the opposition <br /> -T ' does not -have- legal representation at this hearing. However, he went <br /> on; to explain that Canepa Road is now .aishortcut to Lockeford, and��t e,. <br /> traffic .goes right by his front yard.- ''"He' said that Hi1drethLane <br /> � -needs to bewidened as . well-. as _Canepa Road. He said the question was '. <br /> w . <br /> "growth versus no growth'!. but:, it is_ one- of making a profit. " <br /> He said there is considerable land proposed for development in. the <br /> area between West- Lane and Highway 99 He said- the-question of traf- <br /> flow-has- not been adequately addressed. <br /> Don -Ryan said the 40 ­acre zoning was established in- the area to pro- <br /> - -:tect. 'it ' from' development. Regarding the overcrowded condition of the <br /> p= local schools, he said 'that the- development fee, which- is- a one-time <br /> MINUTES <br /> ® PC. 3 17 8 8 p BOS LETTER PAGE 9 <br />