Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 3 <br /> PC: 12-17-92 <br /> SU-92-15 <br /> Page 5 <br /> and impact on fire protection and police protection. Each of these objections is discussed in the following <br /> sections of this staff report. <br /> AREA NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY: <br /> Loss of Agricultural Land and Open Space* <br /> The project site contains one residence, and the remainder of the area is bare ground that is <br /> used seasonally for row crops. This impact is not considered to be significant, as the proposed <br /> use is consistent with the planned use of the area, which is Rural Residential. <br /> Land Use Conflicts: <br /> The Right to Farm Ordinance of San Joaquin County states that any agricultural activity that is <br /> consistent with accepted customs and standards cannot be considered a nuisance because of <br /> changes in the surrounding area. A printed copy of the Right to Farm Ordinance is included with <br /> every building permit. The agricultural practices of spraying, dusting, chemical use, burning, and <br /> noise from tractors and other equipment would be considered normal agricultural activities and <br /> thus not a nuisance. Wherever the separation between agricultural use and residential use exists, <br /> there will be an inevitable conflict. <br /> Parcel Size: <br /> Prior to the 2010 General Plan, most of the Morada area was zoned RR-65 or RR-44, with a <br /> minimum lot size of 65,000 square feet or 44,000 square feet, respectively. Under the 2010 <br /> General Plan,the zone is R-R, which permits a minimum lot size of one net acre with public water <br /> and storm drainage. <br /> Traffic Circulation: <br /> The Vesting Tentative Map shows two cul-de-sac streets, Court A and Court B, that provide the <br /> exclusive access to the existing public roadways. The approximate length of each, respectively, <br /> is 1150 feet and 2400 feet. Court A will provide access for 12 lots, and Court B will provide <br /> access for 20 lots. Court B crosses two parcels that are not included in this Vesting Tentative <br /> Map, so this cul-de-sac street can potentially serve more than 20 lots. The Development Title <br /> states that a cul-de-sac street shall not exceed 660 feet from the centerline of the intersecting <br /> street to the center of the turnaround except where existing physical conditions make such <br /> limitations of length impractical. In no case shall more than 20 dwelling units be served by a cul- <br /> de-sac street. The Department of Public Works has recommended denial of the application <br /> because the circulation does not meet County requirements, since the cul-de-sac streets exceed <br /> the permitted length. <br /> The opposition states that they are concerned with the potential for this project to increase traffic <br /> on Foppiano Lane, Hildreth Lane, and Canepa Road, which provide access to State Route 99 or <br /> Eight Mile Road. <br />