My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
` E <br /> Item No. 3 <br /> PC: 12-17-92 <br /> SU-92-15 <br /> Page 6 <br /> • <br /> Canel2a Road: <br /> The increase of Average Daily Trips(A.D.T.)for Canepa Road would be approximately 10 <br /> trips per residence,which is a total of 170 trips per day. Currently, Canepa Road serves <br /> sevdn residences that are not a part of the project, so the current A.D.T. is about 70. The <br /> total number of trips with the subdivision would be approximately 240 for Canepa Road. <br /> Canepa Road accesses onto Hildreth Lane,which proceeds north to Eight Mile Road and <br /> south and then west to State Route 99 East Frontage. An A.D.T. of 515 was recorded on <br /> Hildreth Lane about one-half mile north of Canepa Road in February 1991. During the <br /> same month, an A.D.T. of 1500 was recorded on Hildreth Lane east of Hilary Lane,which <br /> is about three-quarters of a mile southwest of Canepa Road. <br /> • Foppiano Lane: <br /> There will be 20 residences with access off Foppiano Lane, with a resulting A.D.T. <br /> increase for Foppiano Lane of about 200. In 1981, an A.D.T. of 660 was recorded on <br /> Foppiano Lane east of the Central California Traction Company railroad tracks. That is <br /> the most current A.D.T. record near the project site. <br /> The Development Title states that the traffic capacity for rural residential roads is about 2000 <br /> vehicles per day. <br /> According to ER-88-1, the existing traffic flows were examined in order to develop vehicle <br /> distribution. The existing intersection's Level of Service (LOS) for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours <br /> would remain unchanged with the addition of project traffic (see Attachment A and 13). Also, the <br /> Environmental Impact Report concluded that streets such as Hildreth Lane, Canepa Road, and <br /> Foppiano Lane would continue to function as rural residential streets, and increases in vehicle <br /> traffic from the proposed project would not strain their existing capacity. <br /> Another concern raised by the opposition was the increased potential for an auto-train collision <br /> at the intersection of Hildreth Lane and the Central California Traction Company railroad tracks <br /> as a result of project related traffic. The train crosses Foppiano Lane and Hildreth Lane once in <br /> the morning and once in the evening. The Department of Public Works is requiring that the <br /> subdivider enter into an agreement with San Joaquin County to participate financially in the <br /> installation of improvements for Central California Traction Company crossings at Foppiano Lane <br /> and Hildreth Lane. <br /> Air Pollution: <br /> A letter of opposition mentions the air pollution created during the construction of the residences <br /> and the deterioration of air quality due to the increase of vehicle emissions, wood burning stoves, <br /> fireplaces, and barbecues. The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District did not <br /> respond to this application because the number of single-family parcels proposed does not <br /> exceed the threshold, as determined by San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, <br /> beyond which there would be significant air quality impacts. During on-site construction, the <br /> applicant will be required to comply with the District's dust mitigation measures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.