Laserfiche WebLink
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> 1810 E.HAZELTON AVE.,STOCKTON,CA 95205232 <br /> C�gtr B a�T PHONE:2091468.3120 Fax:2091468-3163 <br /> 2 March 1 <br /> J F r <br /> M E_M_O_R_A_N_D_U_M MAR 15 1994 <br /> NMENTAL <br /> '•TO: Development Committee N PIERMIT I SERVICESLTN <br /> FROM: Richard Larrouy, Associate Planner �7 <br /> SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT PRE-APPLICATION NO. GP-94-01 <br /> OF LAWLEY & VASKO (C/O MOYER CONSULTING) <br /> The proposal is a General Plan Map ;Amendment Pre-application to <br /> change the General Plan designation on three parcels containing <br /> 4.8 acres from R/L (Low Density Residential) to I/L (Limited <br /> Industrial) . The underlying project would be to utilize the site <br /> for a mini-storage and recreational vehicle (RV) parking <br /> facility. The project site is located at the southwest corner of <br /> Mariposa Road and Carpenter Road in southeast Stockton. The <br /> following pre-application comments are intended to inform the <br /> applicant of preliminary considerations on General Plan and <br /> zoning consistency, service requirements, land use conflicts, and <br /> on-site development considerations.! . <br /> GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> The project site is designated as R/L by the maps of the General <br /> Plan, with an accompanying zoning designation of R-L (Low Density <br /> Residential) . In reviewing a request for General Plan Map <br /> Amendment, the Planning Commission ;and the Board of Supervisors <br /> are required to consider overall consistency of the proposal with <br /> the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies. They also <br /> consider the social, physical, and economic factors now existing <br /> that were not considered at the time of the adoption of the <br /> General Plan, as well as- whether - the proposal establishes a <br /> growth-inducing precedent (GeneralPlan 2010, Volume I, Growth <br /> Accommodation-Implementation Objective 13,- pp. IV-12 through IV- <br /> 13) . The pre-application does not contain any information <br /> concerning new social, physical, or economic factors that did not <br /> exist in October of 1992; nor did it address the growth-inducing <br /> k impacts associated with establishing industrial uses in <br /> residentially--designated areas. <br /> x .. <br /> Development of the project site with the proposed use would also <br /> require that the existing zoning designation be changed from R-L <br /> to I-L, The Bases for Approval for: a Zone Reclassification <br /> application require that the project be consistent with the <br /> General Plan. The project does not appear to be consistent with <br /> the General Plan Growth Accommodation Objective No. 2 because it <br /> L <br />