Laserfiche WebLink
�.4. Report:Groundwater-quality Monitoring—January 26,2004: 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, CA, Page 10 <br /> In the case of Monitoring Well MW-4, the sample recovered contained gasoline at a <br /> .. concentration of 600 µg/L but no diesel was detected. The only other analyte of concern <br /> ' detected in that sample was MTBE at 630 µg/L. Both of those concentrations are <br /> moderately higher than the respective concentration of 130 µg/L and 190 j.g/L that were <br /> detected in the sample recovered from that well on October 27, 2003. <br /> The results of the analyses of the samples recovered from Monitoring Wells MW-3 and <br /> MW-4 on January 26, 2004 are consistent with the previously recorded pattern in which <br /> increases and decreases have occurred around a steadily declining trend that has been <br /> L ongoing since groundwater affected by floating product was pumped from the large <br /> excavations opened on the 7500 West Eleventh Street site at the time the underground <br /> ' storage tanks were removed. <br /> As noted previously, a program of periodic purging of LNAPL from Monitoring Well <br /> MW-7 was initiated on November 8, 2003. By January 26, 2004, that program had <br /> AMP reduced LNAPL in the monitoring well to no more than trace. Accordingly, it was <br /> decided that it would be technically appropriate to purge Monitoring Well MW-7 and <br /> recover a sample for analysis. The results of the analysis detected the presence of TPH(d) <br /> at 420 µg/L, TPH(g) at 1,800 µg/L, benzene at 57 µg/L, toluene at 33 gg/L, ethyl benzene <br /> at 57 pg/L and total xylene isomers at 220 µg/L. No fuel oxygenates were detected. <br /> However, SJC remains concerned that, given the historical presence of floating product in <br /> �- the well and the probable limited extent of the zone that is influenced by the floating <br /> product purging program, the cited concentrations of analytes of concern do not <br /> necessarily reflect the concentrations of the analytes of concern beyond a radius of a few <br /> feet from Monitoring Well MW-7. <br /> Concentrations of gasoline were first detected on July 30, 2003 in Monitoring Well MW- <br /> �' 11, but were not present in the samples recovered from that well in October 2003 nor on <br /> January 26, 2004. Though the October 2003 sample contained diesel at a concentration of <br /> 85 µg/L, which was slightly higher than the concentration of 69 µg/l, of diesel-range <br /> i" hydrocarbons first detected in July, no diesel was detected in the sample recovered on <br /> January 26, 2004. MTBE rose from 6.7 µg/L in October 2003 to 16.0 µg/L in January <br /> 2004, which is similar to the 13 gg/L present in the sample recovered from that well on <br /> July 30, 2003. The data obtained from the analyses performed on the sample of <br /> groundwater recovered from Monitoring Well MW-11 on January 26, 2004 (and during <br /> preceding sampling rounds) indicating an absence of any component of fuel hydrocarbon <br /> other than MTBE is consistent with SJC's interpretation that the principal plume of <br /> affected groundwater may have advanced to that location. The plume front is represented <br /> by low concentrations of MTBE, an analyte that is known to be little retarded as it <br /> migrates through subsurface soils and that is not known to be bioremediated by naturally- <br /> occurring biota. <br /> All <br /> 2.4.1.2 Fuel Hydrocarbons and Oxygenates Around Fringes of Principal Plume <br /> The sample recovered from Monitoring Well MW-5 on January 26, 2004 contained no <br /> detectable concentrations of any analytes of concern other than MTBE at a concentration <br /> sic <br />