Laserfiche WebLink
I. Report:Groundwater-quality Monitoring—January 26,2004: 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, CA. Page 11 <br /> of 2.0 gg/L, which is a slight reduction from the concentration of 2.9 gg/L in the sample <br /> recovered from that well in October 2003. It is notable that the sample from Monitoring <br /> Well MW-5 in January 2004, as was also the case in October 2003, contained no <br /> concentration of diesel. Diesel was apparently present at a concentration of 68 gg/L in the <br /> sample recovered from that well on July 30. However, that sample was not treated with <br /> silica gel according to EPA Method 3630 prior to analysis. It was, therefore, taken to be a <br /> false positive for a component of fuel hydrocarbons (The San Joaquin Company Inc. <br /> 2003c); the negative results for diesel obtained from the October 2003 and January 2004 <br /> samples, which were pretreated by EPA Method 3630, confirm that conclusion. As is <br /> i.., shown on Figure 2, Monitoring Well MW-5 is located at the extreme western perimeter <br /> of the plume of affected groundwater. <br /> �.. The only analyte of concern detected in Monitoring Well MW-6 on January 26, 2004 was <br /> MTBE at a concentration of 200 gg/L, which is only slightly higher than the 130 gg/L <br /> detected in the sample recovered in October 2003. Though diesel-range petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons at concentrations of 130 gg/L, and 55 gg/L were detected in the July and <br /> October 2003 monitoring rounds, respectively, the sample recovered on January 26, 2004 <br /> from Monitoring Well MW-6 contained no measurable diesel-range hydrocarbons. <br /> Gasoline had been present in that well during the earliest monitoring rounds, but for the <br /> 12 months between July 2002 and July 2003 it had been absent. It was detected at a <br /> concentration of 130 gg/L in October 2003, but was not detected on January 26, 2004. <br /> As was the case for the sampling round conducted on October 27, 2003, the only analytes <br /> of concern detected in the sample recovered from Monitoring Well MW-10, which is <br /> *- located on the eastern perimeter of the plume, in the sample recovered on January 26, <br /> 2004 were TPHg at 88gg/L and MTBE at 90gg/L, both of which are moderate decreases <br /> compared to the concentrations in the sample recovered from that well in October 2003. <br /> L <br /> 2.4.1.3 Analytes of Concern in Secondary Groundwater Plume <br /> R <br /> As is also shown on Figure 2, a secondary plume of diesel and gasoline emanates from an <br /> area to the rear and slightly to the east of the Casa Mendoza restaurant on the 7500 West <br /> Eleventh Street property. However, in compliance with SJCEHD guidance for the current <br /> groundwater-quality monitoring program, no samples were recovered from either of the <br /> wells in the area of the secondary plume on January 26, 2004. <br /> 4 <br /> AIM 2.4.2 Groundwater Quality in the Deeper Confined Aquifers <br /> In compliance with SJCEHD guidance for the groundwater monitoring program at the <br /> 7500 West Eleventh Street site, no samples were recovered from Monitoring Wells MW- <br /> 3A, 3B and 12A, which are screened at the deeper aquifers on the 7500 West Eleventh <br /> Street site, on January 26, 2004. <br /> t <br /> �- sic <br />