My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0011354 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
3511
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1700019
>
SU0011354 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:35:07 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 11:09:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0011354
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1700019
STREET_NUMBER
3511
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205-
APN
13206010
ENTERED_DATE
5/19/2017 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3511 E CHEROKEE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
5/18/2017 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CHEROKEE\3511\PA-1700019\SU0011354\SS_NL STUDY .PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fparameters <br /> ODUCTION <br /> ent is the Phase II Report detailing the design and description of the operational <br /> of the wastewatermanagement system for this project. The design and operational <br /> parameters are primarily based upon the findings of the testing and analyses protocol described in <br /> the previous Phase I Report. Both these reports are made part of the Nitrate Loading/Soil <br /> Suitability Study Report to be submitted to the San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department (EHD) in the required format which will constitute Phase III of this project. <br /> Discussions on the Operations and Maintenance (O+M) of the system will also be submitted in <br /> the Phase III Report. <br /> As referenced, it will be a number of decades before City of Stockton sewer will be installed to <br /> serve this area. Consequently, the design and operations of the wastewater treatment and soil <br /> disposal system have been engineered to theoretically operate until City sewer arrives. However, <br /> the new septic tanks and associated appurtenances can be considered to have theoretical life spans <br /> of approximately 50 years or more before replacement. The existing grease interceptor tanks and <br /> septic tanks that currently serve the Restaurant are in severe substandard condition, severely <br /> undersized, and must be replaced with properly sized and manufactured tanks. The existing <br /> leachfield is directly west of the Restaurant and must be in extremely poor condition given the <br /> amount of organic material observed discharging into the soil environment from the tanks. <br /> This Report is sequentially structured, beginning with influent and effluent flow volumes from the <br /> existing Omelet House Restaurant and future ARCO Service Station, septic tankage and related <br /> information, followed by Package Treatment Plant information, and ending with effluent disposal <br /> to the soil environment. <br /> II. INFLUENT/EFFLUENT FLOW VOLUMES <br /> A. Omelet House Restaurant <br /> Influent wastewater originating from the Restaurant consists of two separate waste streams: One <br /> for oils and grease contained in food prep, dishwashing,prep sinks and floor drains, and one for <br /> human wastes. The volumes that can be attributed to each waste stream are unknown and <br /> indeterminable. <br /> The Restaurant receives domestic water from California Water Service (Cal Water). <br /> Consequently, water meter readings for this facility were obtained from the Applicants. Water <br /> delivery by Cal Water is measured in 100 cubic ft(748 gallons) increments which are referenced as <br /> CCF. Table 1 below illustrates the monthly water deliveries since the Restaurant was opened by a <br /> new operator in August 2013. Water usage in 2013 is not representative of current flows and is <br /> referenced as not applicable (N/A) in the Table. We see a steady increase in water usage between <br /> the years 2014 and 2016; however, as it is impossible to delineate water usage referenced in the <br /> above two waste streams, a comparatively small percentage of water usage in the summer is used <br /> for landscape irrigation. This is also indeterminable,but a low volume since the landscaping is a <br /> very small area. <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.