Laserfiche WebLink
ATC Associates Inc. <br /> v v 1117 Lone Palm Avenue, Suite B Modesto,California 95351 <br /> 209-579-2221 <br /> 11 a s s n ci Ae s N c_ Fax:209-579-2225 <br /> On April 8, 2004, Gregg In Situ, Inc. advanced a CPT sound boring (CPT-1) immediate down- <br /> gradient of the former USTs (UST#1 and UST#2 noted on Figure 2) and in the vicinity of MW- <br /> 3 to obtain a continuous description of the subsurface lithology. This location was chosen <br /> because groundwater samples collected from MW-3 historically contained the high <br /> concentrations of BTEX constituents with respect to samples collected from the other wells. A <br /> cone mounted with sensors in the tip was advanced into the ground using direct push rods by <br /> Gregg's CPT rig, which has a down pressure capacity of approximately 20 tons. The sensors <br /> measure the response of the soil to the force of the penetrating cone at five centimeter intervals <br /> allowing the subsurface stratigraphy to be characterized. The CPT boring was advanced to <br /> refusal at approximately 58 feet bgs. <br /> Following characterization of the subsurface material, a Hydropunch® type groundwater <br /> sampling system was advanced into the subsurface approximately 2 feet north of the initial CPT <br /> boring location to collect depth discrete soil and groundwater samples. Based on the <br /> stratigraphic profile indicated in the initial CPT sound boring, the Hydropunch® sampler was <br /> advanced to 19 feet bgs and the push rods were retracted exposing a stainless steel filter screen <br /> to the formation allowing for groundwater infiltration. A groundwater sample was collected by <br /> lowering a stainless steel bailer inside the hollow push rods. The groundwater collected inside <br /> the bailer was transferred to laboratory-supplied containers that were placed in a cooler chilled <br /> with ice for subsequent delivery to a State-certified analytical laboratory. After the collection of <br /> the first water sample, the soil sampler was attached to the Hydropunch® rods and advanced to <br /> 25 feet bgs to collect a soil sample from a relatively thick interval of clayey silt separating the <br /> upper and lower water bearing zones. After the collection of the soil sample, the Hydropunch® <br /> sampler was then advanced to 52 feet bgs where the next sand intervals were encountered to <br /> collect a water sample from the second water-bearing zone. The discrete groundwater and soil <br /> samples collected from 19 feet bgs (CPT1-W19), 25 feet bgs (CPT1-S25) and 52 feet bgs <br /> (CPTI-W52)were placed in a cooler chilled with ice for transport to the analytical laboratory. <br /> Selected soil samples from the GP and CPT borings were submitted to Argon Laboratories Inc. <br /> (ELAP #2359) of Ceres, California for analysis that included TPHg and BTEX utilizing EPA <br /> 8015B and 8021B methodologies, respectively, and for oxygenate fuel additives utilizing EPA <br /> 8260B methodology. Soil samples collected from borings GP2, GP3, and CPT1 did not contain <br /> detectable concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, or oxygenate fuel additives. The soil sample <br /> collected from boring GPI at approximately 10.5 feet bgs contained concentrations of TPHg, <br /> ethylbenzene, and total xylenes at 7.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), 0.052 mg/kg, and 0.14 <br /> mg/kg, respectively. No other analytes were detected in these samples. TPHg, BTEX, or fuel <br /> oxygenates were not detected in the sample collected from boring GPI at 15.5 feet bgs. <br /> Page 4 ("- %TC <br /> w:\17861\WP for Additional Subsurface Investigation <br /> Soil Vapor Study,and Modeling ...° ."T`. ..` <br />