Laserfiche WebLink
I� <br /> 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground <br /> sources of contamination identified at the project site: Presently, there are no underground , <br /> storage tanks on the property and visual inspection did not produce any evidence of buried <br /> containers, as well as no odors that would be associated with buried chemical tanks. The subject <br /> parcel does include an existing homesite well and septic system, as previously stated. There is <br /> P: an existing propane tank near the home. (See Tentative map). <br /> 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources <br /> ' of contamination identified in the area of the project site: Past off-site potential for <br /> i contamination is low. Other sources of potential contamination is the surrounding vineyards and <br /> the chemicals used in their farming operation. There is no knowledge of below ground sources �) <br /> ? of contamination in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. <br /> E� <br /> j 3.5 Description of all present off-site potential and/or known above and below ground <br /> i. sources of contamination identified in the area of the project site: Present off-site potential <br /> 1' for contamination is low. Other sources of potential contamination is the surrounding vineyards <br /> E and the chemicals used in their farming operation. There is no knowledge of below ground <br /> sources of contamination in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF <br /> CONTAMINATION IDENTIFIED AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION: <br /> 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified for any <br /> real and/or potential threat to human health and the.environment: The depth to ground <br /> water in this area is approximately 125 feet. Due to this depth, any pesticides, insecticides, and k <br /> fertilizers used on the property in the past or present would have a minimal impact to the ground <br /> water. The use of approved best management practices for the containment of soil or any "y <br /> contaminates by straw waddles around the construction site and other practices to reduce the <br /> introduction of any dirt or contaminates into the storm runoff system will be required at the time j <br /> of any future construction per County Building Department. <br /> 1 <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION: <br /> 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation: The aforementioned farming practices creates the only <br /> ' potential for contamination. There is a natural drainage swale through the southwest corner of F 1 <br /> the subject parcel. The potential for contamination would be low, and no mitigation measures <br /> # . are recommended at this time. <br /> L1 � <br /> F, <br /> 2 i <br /> cA06101Contamination Report 022706 <br />