My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006060
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600146
>
SU0006060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2020 11:19:20 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:10:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0006060
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600146
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
ENTERED_DATE
5/23/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
RECEIVED_DATE
5/23/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\E\ESTES\PA-0600146\SU0006060\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
features. (These design features include interconnected private street design <br /> patterns to promote grater pedestrian and bicycle mobility, access to the <br /> Mountain Hnuse Creek Community Park, and landscaped drive aisles along <br /> interior priv-ate streets; the location of open space areas within the project; <br /> reduced width of internal private streets; the use of deciduous tree species to <br /> provide shade in the summer and solar access in the winter; and the orientation <br /> of buildings,whenever possible,to reduce building surface areas facing east and <br /> west.) <br /> With respect to the Public Financing Plan, the consistency review has determined <br /> the proposed subdivision is consistent with said plan because: 1)development <br /> of the subdivision will finance the pro-rata cost of infrastructure needed to serve <br /> it,through a combination of impact fees, monthly utility charges, special taxes <br /> and MHCSC special taxes; and 2)development of the subdivision will pay the <br /> cost of mitigating impacts on existing facilities, infrastructure and the <br /> environment. <br /> 2. The design or im Drovement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, <br /> the Master Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and any applicable Special Purpose Plan. <br /> • This finding can be made since the analysis conducted by CDD has found that <br /> the design or improvements of the proposed subdivision, as shown on the <br /> Tentative M ap, meets the requirements of the General Plan, Master Plan, and <br /> Specific Plan I. The design of the proposed subdivision provides additional <br /> housing opportunities for future residents. It meets the residential density <br /> requirements of adopted plans. It incorporates a coordinated system of auto, <br /> pedestrian, and bicycle facilities that provide efficient access within the project <br /> and to commercial and public destinations(e.g., K-8 school, Neighborhood Park, <br /> Mountain House Creek Community Park). It creates a distinctive and livable <br /> residential c nvironment within the project. Concerning design themes,the <br /> project will itilize four architectural vernaculars: Traditional, Mission,Craftsman, <br /> and Half Timber,which is consistent with adopted plans and the Multi-Family <br /> Design Manual. In addition, all landscape, hardscape and street elements within <br /> the proposed subdivision will be designed and constructed in accordance with <br /> the adopted community approvals regarding specific themes and material <br /> variation. <br /> 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. <br /> • This finding can be made since the analysis conducted by CDD has found that <br /> the site is physically suitable to accommodate the residential uses proposed. <br /> This analysis is based on the improvements proposed; the assessment of the <br /> hydrology and water quality of the site; and the lack of potential, significant <br /> impacts to biological resources within the project site. <br /> 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. <br /> • This finding can be made since the analysis conducted by CDD has found that <br /> the area proposed for development is adequate in size to accommodate the <br /> density of development proposed, consistent with the Master Plan and Specific <br /> Plan I. <br /> 5. Neither the desig'i of the subdivision nor any proposed improvements are likely to cause <br /> substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.