Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Screening <br /> According to Development Title Section 9-1022.4[d], a solid masonry wall six (6) feet to <br /> seven (7) feet in height shall be required as the proposed residential use will abut a <br /> commercial project. As a result, a continuous solid masonry wall six (6) to seven (7) feet <br /> in height shall be erected along the northern property lines of Lots 3-11 (as depicted on <br /> Revised Tentative Map dated August 16, 2006) and the western property line of Lot 1. In <br /> addition, Development Title Section 9-1020.4(8) states street trees shall be required <br /> along street frontages where noise attenuation walls are required and shall either be <br /> placed in the yard or integrated with a serpentine wall. The applicant will need to depict <br /> the masonry wall and street trees on the subdivision improvement plan, indicating how <br /> the wall will be constructed. Also, the applicant will need to specify if a Homeowner's <br /> Association will be responsible for maintenance of landscaping contiguous to the wall. <br /> Noise <br /> Development Title Section 9-1025.9 lists the Residential use type as a noise sensitive <br /> land use. An Environmental Noise Analysis was prepared by Charles M. Salter <br /> Associates, Inc. on September 27, 2005. The first row of proposed residences facing <br /> Highway 12188 will be exposed to future traffic noise levels which exceed the 65 dB Ldn <br /> standard for San Joaquin County. In order to achieve the acceptable exterior noise level <br /> of 65dB (Development Title Section 9-1025.9), an eleven-foot barrier between Highway <br /> 12188 and Lots 1, 87-102, 108, 109, and 112-115 shall be constructed. Additionally, a <br /> five-foot tall barrier shall be required from Lots 3 through 20. <br /> Pedestrian Access <br /> The Tentative Map exhibits two pedestrian access areas, one entering into an alley and <br /> one pedestrian corridor entering onto Sierra Drive. The proposed corridor appears to <br /> consist of portions of Lots 86 and 87. The applicant will need to clarify what property <br /> lines comprise Lots 86, 87, and the proposed corridor and how both proposed <br /> pedestrian accesses will be maintained. <br /> Opposition Letters/ Traffic/ Park <br /> The Community Development Department has received six letters in opposition to the <br /> project. Specifically, neighbors have expressed concerns regarding traffic and a need for <br /> a park. A traffic study was prepared by Dowling Associates, Inc. on May 31, 2006 and <br /> included mitigation measures that will ensure any impacts due to traffic would be <br /> reduced to a less-than-significant level. The mitigation measures proposed are included <br /> in the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval letter. With regards to a park, <br /> the Department of Parks and Recreation will require the collection of in-lieu fees for park <br /> development. <br /> Oak Trees <br /> The project site contains a number of heritage and native oak trees. The applicant has <br /> stated that he wants to preserve the oak trees. However, compliance with the <br /> requirement of a noise attenuation wall appears to conflict with the existing location of <br /> oak trees. The applicant will need to clarify if he is preserving or removing the trees. <br /> To protect and preserve heritage oak trees and native oak trees from development and <br /> construction activity the following condition of approval is recommended: <br /> 3 <br />