Laserfiche WebLink
8.0 IDENTIFIED CONTAMINATION SOURCES <br /> The following sources of past, current, on-site, and off-site contamination have been <br /> identified as a result of this investigation: <br /> Identified Contamination Source Evaluation & Recommendations <br /> 1. The Site was developed for agriculture in Agricultural chemicals may remain in Site <br /> 1937 or earlier. (Current and past on- soils. The only way to determine the <br /> site) presence or absence of these chemicals <br /> is by testing and analysis. Typically, any <br /> such testing is conducted at the property <br /> owner's discretion. <br /> 2. Agricultural chemical permits indicate The owner should be aware that residues <br /> that the Site was used to grow cherries may remain even when chemicals are <br /> and wine grapes 2007 through the applied as permitted. <br /> present. Numerous chemicals were <br /> applied to the Site during this time <br /> (Appendix 4). (Current and past on-site) <br /> 3. Surrounding properties are used for Agricultural chemicals continue to be <br /> agriculture. (Current and past off-site) applied to these sites. Assuming <br /> responsible application, no action is <br /> warranted at this time. <br /> 4. One structure used for washing and The ground beneath the structure may <br /> cleaning asparagus was located near have been treated with environmentally <br /> the center of the southern property line persistent pesticides. Lead may be <br /> in the 1980s. It is unclear whether the present in the soil surrounding the former <br /> structure was located on the Site or on structure. Underground infrastructure <br /> the adjacent, embedded parcel. (Past may exist in the vicinity of the former <br /> on- or off-site) structure as well. The property owner <br /> should consider these possibilities before <br /> disturbing soil in the area of the building <br /> footprint. <br /> LOGE 1208 Page 6 <br />