My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004324
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
88 (STATE ROUTE 88)
>
18819
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0200428
>
SU0004324
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:24:09 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:21:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004324
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0200428
STREET_NUMBER
18819
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 88
City
CLEMENTS
APN
01924018
ENTERED_DATE
5/17/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18819 E HWY 88
RECEIVED_DATE
10/4/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\E\HWY 88\18819\PA-0200428\SU0004324\CDD OK.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
489
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Y es 'FRbM FAX NO. :2099315186 �?g. 09 2003 04:03PM P3 <br /> providing details of that meeting to me? Please note that I have received no correspondence or <br /> meeting notes from San Joaquin County EHD regarding what was discussed in that meeting. <br /> Letter Dated June 25.20113 <br /> With regards to your letter dated June 25,2003; <br /> i <br /> 1. Paragraph 1: 1 have attached an addendum to the Information I submitted on June 11,2003 In <br /> response to your request for information dated May 30,2003, Specifically I have provided the <br /> wastewater quality used on actual samples of our wastewater.(Attached)I hope that this will <br /> provide adequate data,when provided with the previously supplied Information,to give hoard staff <br /> the ability to concur with my assertion that the threat to groundwater quality from our Industrial <br /> waste Is nil. <br /> 2. Paraoraoh 2:This paragraph contains two errors based on miscommunication and <br /> misinterpretation of Chesney's Septic Design Report. <br /> a. Your statement that"...the project has changed substantially..."is incorrect as well as the <br /> statement that"Each of these devices and uses will add wastewater flow to the system <br /> and were not Included In the original sizing calculations". <br /> i. Chesney's referenced document did not Include a completeequipment list and <br /> plumbing plan. It was never a comprehensive and definitive explalnation of every <br /> piece of equipment and process we have. Its intention was to give our overall <br /> water use and design parameters for the septic system and nitrite studies. The <br /> "changes"are actually Clarifications and uses that are still well within the per diem <br /> usage. <br /> ii. Chesneys report on page 10 states that Clean-Up at the end of each day is <br /> approximately 325 gallons a day. This should have been more accurately <br /> described as"maximum allowable non-domestic water usage". <br /> I <br /> 1. For example I know that we only use about 100 gallons per day Including <br /> the washing machine. What Chesney did for a design approach was to <br /> work backwards from allowable maximum discharge based on nitrite <br /> levels and square footage,subtracted the amount of black water that is <br /> calculated by County Sewage standards for customers and employees <br /> and came up with a maximum allowable process water flow. This <br /> number is well above what we use. He chose to not use the detailed <br /> Information had provided him regarding wash down flow rates,wash <br /> down frequency, and washing machine usage and capacity. � <br /> 2. We will be installing a flowmeter in the wastewater system so exact <br /> usage will be monitored.The bottom line Is that the Flowmeter will tell us <br /> exactly how much water we are using, <br /> I <br /> b, ParagraphA: This paragraph Is basically a restatement of paragraph 3, We are aware of <br /> the need to keep water usage to a minimum. As an example of our attention to this area <br /> we have at extra cost, Installed lavaratory fixtures that shut off automatically. <br /> c. I believe that anybody with some general knowledge of wastewater systems can clearly <br /> see that our facility will not even come close to the design criteria of 1,800 gallons per day <br /> even when future growth and customer visits are factored in. I would challenge anyone to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.