My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004324
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
88 (STATE ROUTE 88)
>
18819
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0200428
>
SU0004324
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:24:09 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:21:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004324
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0200428
STREET_NUMBER
18819
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 88
City
CLEMENTS
APN
01924018
ENTERED_DATE
5/17/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18819 E HWY 88
RECEIVED_DATE
10/4/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\E\HWY 88\18819\PA-0200428\SU0004324\CDD OK.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
489
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
+�FROM <br /> + FAX N0. :2099315186 fpr. 29 2003 03:37PM P4 <br /> r <br /> B. Your conditions of approval do not indicate that your <br /> approval is contingent upon the prior approval of another, different <br /> government agency. <br /> C. Second, I submitted the information requested by the <br /> Water Board on March 17�h as well as again last week. Evidently <br /> because of State budget cuts they do not anticipate even looking at <br /> my file prior to the middle of May. If this is true it will be a hugely <br /> damaging blow to our schedule and our business. i cannot imagine <br /> why, given the exposure and knowledge you have of my project, <br /> you are not able to cooperate with me and allow me to move <br /> forward. <br /> D. Thirdly, most people knowledgeable of wastewater and <br /> who are: familiar with the details of our project believe we are too � <br /> small to be of a significant concern to the State Board. <br /> I <br /> E Tim C}' Tien of the Califarnla Realonal Water�uali Bo has asked <br /> me "What is It about ypur ro ect that as environmental health Sen <br /> Joa u Coun so uneasy about your project? E <br /> i told him I do not honestly know, I myself am Intrigued, What have you <br /> told him? The concem for buses seems a common thread. <br /> F. You have mentioned, "it I§ really a stretch to utilize acetic syste„ m on an <br /> industrtal ro'ect like ours". <br /> It is very disconcerting if you actually feel this way at this late date after all <br /> I have done. <br /> The system that Chesney consulting designed has a number of large <br /> margins of Safety incorporated as key elements of its design. I am not <br /> even going to reiterate the total margin of safety in this document. ' <br /> As a practical matter since moving to San Joaquin (county 8 years ago, <br /> we have been at the same facility utilizing a septic system that was never <br /> sized or designed for the type of use we are proposing. We have had no <br /> problems and to the best of my knowledge the system was only recently <br /> pumped out far the first time. <br /> G. You have.stated that we have completelyy ghanaed caur pM ect since we <br /> first proposed it. <br /> There have indeed been numerous small changes to the design and <br /> layout of our facility, as you would expect when designing a brand new <br /> facility. We have however not changed the main concept of what we are <br /> doing. <br /> The biggest change is that we are not putting our offices in the 2nd floor of <br /> the brtek building but rather are locating them on a mezzanine in the new ' <br /> metal building. The second floor of the brick building will now instead <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.