Laserfiche WebLink
RESPONSE: <br /> The Plarating Commission determined that this is not the proper location for a project of this scale and <br /> Intensity and that these projects would crease problems relative to traffic and noise. <br /> 5. APPF, L UATEMEM. <br /> "The Planning Commission did not consider the recommendation of its staff that the site Is physically <br /> suable for the type of developrnM and for the Intensity of the development.` <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> This Fmx ft was not a basis for the denial of these applications. The Development Title does not limit <br /> the building intensity in a AG-40 zone. <br /> 6. APPEAL STATEMENT: <br /> Thi the Environmental Initial Study prepared found no potert sally significant mental impacts that <br /> were detrimental to the public health, safety of welfare to the property or improvement of adjacent <br /> Pr'oP -" <br /> RESPONSE: , <br /> The Planning Commission denied the appkAdon based on the potential problems that the truck traf�c <br /> would cause to the public safely and welfare, and the potentially adverse impacts. The neighbor to the <br /> north said that the CoUnty Agricultural Inspector WIN require them to isob d their spraying operation in <br /> order to create a buffer and he would have to forfeit four rows of trees because of their proximity to the <br /> porposed packing y <br /> 7. APPEAL STATEMENT: <br /> "The Planning Commission ignored the economic benefits to the County,the growers and the employees <br /> of the applicant, and the local businesses In the community. The Busirtess Council of San Joaquin <br /> County appeared. This project was and is supported by the San Joaquin County Farm Bureau. The <br /> Farm Bureau letter was submitted to the Planning Staff.` <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> One of the Comrriissioners commented that the economics should be considered when decisions are <br /> made and the Consnisslon should try to help and encourage Wk stry to locate where it can grow. The <br /> projects were denied based on potentially signiticartt traafflc Impacts and the likelihood of adversely <br /> Impacting ung ply. <br /> M)D� <br /> CHET DAV ISSON <br /> DIRECTOR <br /> CD:La:fa <br /> Eno Appeal, Mme, Staff Report <br /> c: Henry Foppiano and Robert Chinchiolo <br /> Joseph Rishwaln <br /> Mike Hakeem <br /> SOS LETTER PACE 3 <br />