Laserfiche WebLink
APPLICATION OF FOPPIANO ie CSYmC$IOLO <br /> BASIS FOR APP9hL ` (Continued) <br /> 4. By adiding `twa_ 'cold stotagis buildings, thoko till be .less <br /> traffic and thus, .,gack Tone' Rcad will' be 'safer. <br /> 5. The Pisnning Co-mmission listener to peopla who live <br /> along Fairchild RQ4d, andakssumed that apple trucks will use <br /> Fairchild Road, when by `the. admissions of these pebp`le, the <br /> Applicant's trucks, do 'not use Fairdhild Road'. <br /> 6. : The Planning Commission did not consider the - <br /> recommendation of its staff that the site is physically suitable <br /> for the type of deS�elopment (adding two cold storage warehouses) <br /> and for the intensity of the development. <br /> 7 . That the Environmental Initial Study priepa►red found no <br /> potentially significant environmental impacts that were <br /> detrimental to, _the .public health, safety or welfare to the <br /> property or improvements of adjacent properties. <br /> 8. That there has been a packing shed on this property <br /> since 1977, and its use is compatible with 'the -toning. <br /> 9. The Planning Commission ignored the economic benefits to . <br /> the County, the, growers and, the employees of the Applicant, and <br /> the local businesses" in. the community. The Business Council of <br /> San Joaquin County appeared. <br /> 10. This 'project was` and is supported-by t ra San Joaquin <br /> County Farm' Bureau. The farm Bureau better was 'sUbmitted to the <br /> Planning Staff. <br /> —2— <br />