My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0003099
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FAIRCHILD
>
13361
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-93-04
>
SU0003099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2020 9:09:23 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 6:29:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0003099
PE
2633
FACILITY_NAME
SA-93-04
STREET_NUMBER
13361
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FAIRCHILD
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
11/6/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
13361 E FAIRCHILD LN
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\F\FAIRCHILD\13361\SA-93-04_SA-93-03\SU0003099\APPL.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
feet to the vast of the proposed site. He was concerned over <br /> traffic on Fairchild Road. <br /> Natie RoRsi (119$9 a. Sun Rd. ) , objacted` to application process#9 <br /> procedures.- She' .telt that. the- proposed, parking, facilities were <br /> inadequate. <br /> Rebu=t: Sen_derov (�2797 ' E. Fairchild ad. ) said rural agricu3tural <br /> area b are, for 3ferme s And 'residences. She, felt tbere would. bo <br /> expansions of the use' 'And "that there would be,: restrictions placed <br /> on the local operations. <br /> Dave Podesta: `(13344 Pmirchila Rd,.)-.i said° he reisea cherries. He. <br /> was concerned about the possibility of water contamination, noise <br /> and the inveibidfiof litivaci to :other property -owners. <br /> Debbie Davis - (.4,778 N. U& Tone Rd.) said her: p:Foporty is directly. <br /> acr%=ss from'ths` ekistinq operation. She swid;that. the.=farmers from. <br /> the area are also in business and should be prated. <br /> REBUTTAL: Mr. Rishwain reiterated his 'statements- that,.the project <br /> will not impact the local farmers and residents with traffic or <br /> noise. He said there are other such-- facilities in the area. <br /> PUBLIC HEIRING CLOSED <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION: <br /> Comm. Holly said that evidence had been submitted that there will . <br /> not be an increase in the amount of water used-on.-the site or as <br /> increase in the truck trips. Nr. Chinchiolo is a :responsible <br /> operator and will, continue to be so. The zoning is appropriate for <br /> the use. The-�vpsrs�ion is`'`cicse to the growers. . <br /> Comm. Norri said that not all of the produce to be placed in <br /> storage is grown in the area. (Asparagus) . Mwh of the fees, paid <br /> by such an operation will only offset expenses to the County. The <br /> impact on the people in the area should be :considered. Tie could, <br /> not , make Findurtys 04 and 05. The project will be injurious to <br /> adloininq prope . The use is 'Aot.compatible' with adjoining land <br /> uses. This is twt the praper'location for a pro}eet of this size. <br /> Comm. Rojas said that economics should be considered when decisions <br /> are made. The Commission should try to help and encm=age industry <br /> to locate where ` 1+. ' 'can gr6w. go was. concerned over the truck <br /> traffic. He noted the availability of industrial land in the <br /> County. <br /> Comm. Jungeblut said he agreed that the Chinchiolo operation should <br /> have a new facility and should be able to expand, but did not feel <br /> that this location would be appropriate. He said there will be <br /> PC MINUTES 4/15/93 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.