Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County <br /> Community Development Department , <br /> Development Services Division <br /> 1810 E Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> Attn: Leanne Mueller <br /> Subject Application#PA-0200577(GP) & PA-0200576(ZR) <br /> Ms Mueller, <br /> I guess I'm confused by the notification. My impression on the zoning from Rural <br /> Residential to Very Low Density Residential seems to be incorrect. I thought it was <br /> required by the owners of the properties because of the subdivision to the south. Now I <br /> understand that it is being requested by the owner in order to have the ability to divide the <br /> Iots in half then to put two living units on each half...three residential lots becoming <br /> twelve residences. How, by any stretch of the imagination, does that meet the definition <br /> of Very Low Density Residential? <br /> Where I first felt chagrined by the loss of the open space,now f'm incensed by the <br /> spoiling of a rural neighborhood where no such HIGH density exists. How can this be <br /> allowed? Surely the planners recognize this rezoning as a ruse! I thought we'd already <br /> resolved this issue of proper lot size compatible with the area in other engagements with <br /> planning entities. It seems the county` didn't get the'message. Retain density compatible <br /> with the area Period! <br /> I know our new Supervisor understands the value of rural environment,regardless of <br /> housing pr ores. is desired rezoning by the property owner,is ill advise and <br /> unwanted Ll forwarding a copy of this correspondence to Leroy Ornellas asking <br /> that he ad hi of to mine...and others—proclaiming this effort to rezone a very bad <br /> idea. <br /> gar r. <br /> Terrance E. nd Ann S. bangle <br /> CC Leroy Ornellas; County Supervisor <br />