Laserfiche WebLink
.• _005 05 :09 PM METCCH <br /> P 62 <br /> May 1, 2005 <br /> 18 0 Joaquin <br /> ount q Community Development DePat'tment <br /> Stockton CA 95205 <br /> RE: application number p4.()5022 19(SA) <br /> I ant writing this letter in response to the above stated application. <br /> Inrm n O <br /> f the request for a site permit to establish a keplica on the <br /> Fu d Acao <br /> declined. mP , CA, 1 am requesting that thea Property <br /> application for site at 24400 <br /> The establishment approval be <br /> ment of a kennel at the <br /> Property owners in the surroundin above location would have a n <br /> g area. The following reaso egadve effect on the <br /> 1) The project local ns are as follows: <br /> Additional automobile tr�s at the end Of a dead end road that is not <br /> the the Other property ownersffloctthat <br /> ha n the road.location <br /> would have a negative publicly maintained. <br /> property owners along the road, with The road is currently bnancial impact on <br /> Schenk. no assist om the eIng maintained by <br /> slice fr ppli <br /> caret, Suzanne <br /> 2). Suzanne has had, in the <br /> which' a county violation. past, as man as 2 <br /> have reported t Currently, I do no 0 dogs on the property at the <br /> his to the San Ioa t have a count of the do same time, <br /> this violation has not been ad quip County Animal c g at the location I <br /> Property <br /> been enforced, If, in actses the tntoit on has ntrol. I don't understand why <br /> complied. Nor, aPPltcant and the limitation of dogs on the <br /> has the county enforced the been addressed, Suzanneviolation, has not <br /> 3) With the large number <br /> lasted f of dogs on the <br /> annoying Not onl ng Ods of time. As neighbor�rty' the barking is extremely i <br /> anno y oud and has <br /> has in the Y is it disruptive during �Property owner, this is <br /> Past been as issue du Mg the day light hours when extremely <br /> and extended periods of Barkin ng the night, disrupting o en we are outsids, but <br /> Control. As stated in co g a number of times to the eeP I have reported the loud <br /> Suzanne has done d in c tmment 2, if this issue has San Joaquin County Animal <br /> disturbance that her do 8 control the barking been addressed by the Ani <br /> lis cause. g. She has given no re mal Control <br /> Bards to the <br /> 4)_ On a number ofoccasions <br /> loose on the road in ° Suzanne s dogs have <br /> property. Another i front of ary Property, we have hadtots side <br /> of her <br /> has for the surrounding d�e of lack of co se them bard and running <br /> mro1 she has with her animals and the <br /> to her <br /> tt8 property owners disregard she <br />